this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
737 points (98.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

32464 readers
474 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

Because it can't be turned into a service

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've actually found a lot of the smaller foss tools I use are better than their proprietary counterparts because of the design philosophy and that people don't cut as many corners on passion projects as when they're on a deadline

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For real. I just spent a decade in academia working dog hours with little pay keeping services running wondering how the true devs and sysadmins do it.

I recently switched to the corporate world and have peeked behind curtain of competency: headless chickens running around, patching failing products rather than spending time to properly fix them because immediate results are the only metric that counts.

Stability, scalability, reproducibility? Forget it, that's someone else's problem apparently.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Late stage capitalism.

The issue is that capitalism fundamentally requires forward thinkers and enlightened (or at least rational) perspective to function sustainably.

But capitalism rewards short term thinking, everywhere from corporate leadership, to the workforce, to the consumers caught by ads designed to catch and hold their ever-shortening attention spans.

Fundamentally, it needs regulation to thrive. The true cost of a purchase, including environmental and decommissioning/disposal costs must be tied to the initial purchase value. Through this, we might get a functional capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Dear floss4life,

Our developers have encountered an issue while using the open source framework you published on github. We have lost as many as 400 user accounts. The estimated cost of this error is $6800.

This is unacceptable. Be a professional and fix it immediately.

Chad Elkowitz, MBA, Gruvbert and sons Finance Lt"

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's why the no warranty clause is by far the most important in any license granting access to the public

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

And it’s also why many companies refuse to use open software. It baffles me that no insurance company saw this as a market opportunity to sell open source software insurance.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I love this meme because every app on my phone designed by a company worth more than a million dollars fucking sucks, and the best app on my phone is RIF, an app designed by a single developer, and reanimated into a lich by a team of programmers for free

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wait RIF was reanimated? In what way?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

"somehow RIF returned.."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

This guide should help

https://github.com/KobeW50/ReVanced-Documentation/blob/main/Reddit-Client-ID-Guide.md

It might seem daunting depending on your experience with computers, but the guide was good enough for my tech-illiterate ass

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Same for Apollo and now Voyager. Probably the best-designed and -implemented apps I’ve ever used.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I have no clue how much British Gas is worth, but that is the worst app ever. Doesn’t update your bill/balance in anything approaching real time. Frequently doesn’t let you log in.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wait wait wait... RiF ain't dead?!

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I would say it's undead. Like a Lich. The fine folks at revanced.app have done an amazing job reanimating it. It's just as good as it was last June!

This guide should help

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Can you log in yet? Last time I did this I couldn't log into an account, only browse.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 165 points 3 days ago (4 children)

It's funny because apps like Blender and Krita are actually competitive to proprietary software.

[–] [email protected] 88 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And Linux/BSD are so good proprietary developers rip them off to whatever degree legally permissible.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 3 days ago

Microsoft servers also use linux

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (4 children)

And Firefox, git, Dia, gimp, etc...

Proprietary OS's like Windows and macOS lack package managers too that tools like chocolatey and homebrew provide.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Dia and gimp are ok, but they’re still quite behind the curve. I love floss and wouldn’t use the closed alternatives, but we got to know where we stand.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Windows has WinGet now, which is a built in package manager. It might not be as good as most linux distro package managers, but it does exist.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (5 children)

There are proprietary VCS?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

git was created because a proprietary VCS was being a dick

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

There were many.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

There's perforce

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Blender had a reeeeaaally long way though, I remember a time where Blender was quite big already but Maya just was miles ahead in terms of usability. Nowadays they are not only even, Blender is probably used more often since it's not only free but more people know how to use it than Maya

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

80/20

I live by this rule, it made me gain so much credibility and money from people who don’t know any better. 80/20 <3

20 percent of work nets you 80 percent of result (except no one knows what I did isn’t 100 percent) bam 4/5 of time saved. Everyone is happy and if something doesn’t work we can just blame it on client

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

I follow the 80/20 rule recursively. as soon as I've gotten 80% of the way there for 20% effort I immediately stop, and start a brand new project for the remaining 20%. Bam! 96% complete for only 24% effort.

taps forehead

[–] [email protected] 95 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Read "The Mythical Man-Month".

Basically, a team of 5-8 motivated developers can create high quality, medium complexity software extremely fast.
But if the project is just a little too complex for one team of devs and you need more people, then you'll need a lot more people. And a lot more time.

Cause the more people you add to the project, the more overhead you have. Suddenly you need to pull devs off coding to bring new hires up to speed. You need to write documentation on coding style guidelines, hold meetings, maintain your infrastructure, negotiate with hardware suppliers, have someone fix the server room's door locks, schedule job interviews, etc. etc.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 days ago

“What one programmer can do in one month, two programmers can do in two months.”

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Counterpoint: 'The Brooks's Law analysis (and the resulting fear of large numbers in development groups) rests on a hidden assummption: that the communications structure of the project is necessarily a complete graph, that everybody talks to everybody else. But on open-source projects, the halo developers work on what are in effect separable parallel subtasks and interact with each other very little; code changes and bug reports stream through the core group, and only within that small core group do we pay the full Brooksian overhead.'

Source: http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/ar01s05.html

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

It absolutely fucking BAFFLES me that Brooks' Law isn't known by every software manager on the planet.

I've quoted it so many times at work, even in engineering focused teams in at least two big tech companies. It's not a concrete fact, but it explains why so many teams are hilariously shit at delivering software.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

i want to boil people like this alive

in minecraft of course

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

It got renamed? That seems pretty crazy, but it might be for the better considering the original name didn't really suggest it was a serious independent project.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

.. that depends on this FOSS app.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 days ago (8 children)

It's hilarious that you think that proprietary software is actually better.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Well, sometimes it happens. Lemmy was semi-broken during the APIocalypse, and there still isn't such a thing as a FOSS Facebook, or search engine backend for that matter.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago

“What one programmer can do in one month, two programmers can do in two months.”

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Star designers and engineers don't do Open Source? 🥺

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago

“All-star” makes me worried there’s some hidden society of super competent developers remaining at the big software corps that we somehow never noticed.

load more comments
view more: next ›