emergencyfood

Oh no, I understood what you meant. But I feel that OP's approach is correct. They used the words correctly, so that those who already know the meanings can understand what they are saying. Some people did not know what 'capitalism' meant, so they critiqued the meme based on their own understandings. Then OP was able to explain to them the correct meaning.

Returning to my analogy, let us say someone is teaching that 2 + 2 = 4. They can say, 'you already know that 1 + 1 = 2, now multiply both sides by 2'. If a student does not know that 1 + 1 = 2, they can then explain it.

A meme can have only so much text. If they had to derive everything from first principles each time, we would get nowhere.

One plus one is two, not three or twenty six. If a bunch of people go around thinking that one plus one is three, that has no effect on reality. Such people must be educated as necessary, yes, but we should not avoid speaking the truth out of fear of confusing them.

Societies aren't different because they have different technology with the same economic system. It feels like you're saying indigenous societies wouldn't have been able to industrialise without changing their political system radically

Societies with different technologies would tend to have very different social and economic systems. Indigenous societies that industrialise do end up changing their political systems because of this.

Drag doesn't buy the distinction you're making between indigenous communism and industrialised communism.

Industrialised communism does not exist, at least yet, but any industrial society will necessarily need to organise itself in a very different way from a primitive society (whether communist or not).

Language changes over time, and technical words are often misunderstood. It is definitely unfortunate, but I don't think it is some sort of conspiracy.

The solution to ignorance is education, not humouring the ignorant. People need to have a basic understanding of the world around them if they are to improve it in any manner. Unfortunately, that involves learning some technical terms. Yes, some people will be confused, but realising that you are confused is the first step in learning something new.

It depends on your definition of 'deGoogle'. You can disable the Google apps on most Android phones. They'll take up storage space, but won't run.

If you're getting a second-hand phone and want to completely deGoogle it, you can check if (1) the bootloader is unlockable and (2) custom ROMs are available online (e.g. Lineage OS compatible devices). In general, Xiaomi, Motorola and Pixel devices have unlockable bootloaders, but not all their models have custom ROMs.

I don't think that's the meaning OP is going for. In philosophy, idealism is the position that ideas exist independently of materials, or even that ideas are the true reality and the material world is either false or just a reflection of it. Many religions argue for some form of idealism.

Materialism, in contrast, is the idea that the material world is the primary one, and that ideas are at best descriptions of materials. Marxists and physical scientists hold this view. Finally, dualism is the idea that there is both a material and an ideal (i.e. 'of ideas', not 'perfect') world. Descartes is probably the most famous proponent of this school.

In the modern age, pretty much all serious thought accepts materialism, often implicitly, to the point that the material world is often called the 'real world' or even 'the world'. But this was not always so, and there are still relics of idealist and dualist thinking.

They also seem surprised when a non-white country proves to have a better understanding of, well, anything.

i'm convinced that this is one of the bellweathers for ww3

Counterpoint: advanced chips aren't as important geopolitically as people think.

1. Older chips are more than enough for missiles and drones, so there's no military advantage.

2. There is an industrial advantage in things like datacentres and big data analysis, but older chips can do these things if you put enough of them together and give them enough electricity.

Bleeding edge chips shine in consumer electronics, but WW3 isn't going to start over whether Huawei Mate 69 Pro or Samsung S42+ is superior.

What's OC?

isn't France still part of Europe?

It is, it's the UK that left (the EU, not the continent).

The Gelph-Ghibelline conflict was about secular monarchism vs religious authority. Im not sure I see the point you're making.

That the conflict between feudal lords (French aristocrats / Ghibellines) and urban merchants (Guelph burghers / French Girondists) is much older than the French Revolution. The pope and emperor were the figureheads, but the lords and merchants were the power blocs.

The division of political ideologies into left and right derives from the French Parliament which had the monarchists on the right and the liberals on the left.

The names yes, but the basic conflict is much older, Europe itself had the Guelph-Ghibelline conflict.