FiskFisk33

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago (3 children)

but it removed half the point...?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

i know this is a joke, but i find it quite interesting those two words have completely different etymologies.

Grave as in burial site comes from an old proto indo european word for "dig", while grave as in serious comes from french.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

I mean, sure, you won't stay alive for very long with a stopped heart.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I meant like, when someones heart stops and gets restarted again with cpr or a defibrillator or something. People often call that being dead, and coming back.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

people say quitting smoking is hard. I don't understand, I do it multiple times a day.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yup. I don't think training should be considered breaking copyright. Regurgitating though should.

There are examples of use cases besides the right now obvious one of LLMs "creating" "original" content.

One that comes to my mind is indexing books. Allowing for people to search for books based on a description.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

I know this is a definition in many places. I find it stupid and useless.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 5 days ago (27 children)

The heart beating is not a good definition of being alive in my opinion. The heart stopping temporarily doesn't mean you died, you were just in terribly grave danger.

If a person is defined by their heart, what does that make a heart transplant?

utterly useless definition.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

On the other hand, it is not the learning in your example that is illegal, but the recital.

If you learn ten books by heart and make money writing shitty fanfics, thats not necessarily illegal.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

oh god the reason is even stupider then I expected

Because large numbers use the e character in their string representation (e.g., 6.022e23 for 6.022 × 1023), using parseInt to truncate numbers will produce unexpected results when used on very large or very small numbers. parseInt should not be used as a substitute for Math.trunc().

view more: next ›