633
Stopped sharing... until they can manage the pr? No way they're letting go of that revenue stream.
this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
633 points (98.9% liked)
Technology
58115 readers
4389 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The class action lawsuit will wipe out that piddly revenue stream a hundred times over.
We can only hope.
Oh sorry, Supreme Court has been working overtime the last decade to limit those. Probably thrown out.
I just bought a dryer and it had a piece of paper taped to it that said "By using this appliance you agree to have all disputes handled by third-party arbitration by the party of our choice."
For a fucking dryer.
Didn't forget refrigerator. LG has been doubling down on that bullshit
1, you may be able to opt out within certain purchase time depending on product, company, etc.
- There is a suit in CA or somewhere currently challenging the ability of appliance company to prove the notice was provided or accepted. Insane fucking companies.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(11 replies)
Not sharing the driving behavior.... for now. Any faucet that can be turned off can be turned on again.
They're only stopping because they got caught. Once the masses move on to the next Pitch Fork event, they'll start it back up again.
Yup. I'll trust them when they let us turn it off and on.
They're just saying this because they got caught. They might not even actually stop doing it. And even if they do, they'll just wait until the majority has forgotten about this and quietly start doing it again...
Oh they'll stop.... Til everyone forgets.
Yes. The headline definitely needs a "for now" to be accurate.
And you know the cars aren't going to stop generating the data either for when they decide they want it.
Would be way cooler if they just stopped collecting it.
I think fixing this problem will require making the collection illegal, with meaningful enforcement.
Our legislators don't want that though. In fact they're currently trying to force the sale of US TikTok to a US company likely so they can collect even more data on us.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Would be way cooler if they couldn't collect it.
Cars shouldn't have Internet connectivity and telemetry collection at all. I don't care what "quality of life" improvements they bring, if they use it to spy on and profit off their customers after paying for the vehicle then it should be banned. I know most people don't give a shit about their privacy but when it starts affecting their wallet, they will.
I don't care what "quality of life" improvements they bring,
None.
There's plenty; they're just not for the end user.
What, don't you enjoy the incredible feature of your car being a rolling computer that constantly gets over the air software updates? Don't you want to experience the joy of being stuck waiting for a forced Windows update, but instead of your computer it's your car? Why would anybody not want this incredible and so clearly beneficial experience?!?
Cut the power to the OnStar module and cut the wire to the cell antenna. Cars do not need to connect to the Internet... Ever
IDK, the ability to remote activate climate control, start/stop charging and control charge power to match my solar power are all quite good reasons for me to have my car connected.
We should be able to have nice things without surveillance. We shouldn't refrain from these things, we should legislate so they're not allowed to collect data and share it without explicit consent.
That stuff should be operable on a published and standardized protocol that third-party units can easily talk to. Put in your own little control box with cellular transceiver.
load more comments
(6 replies)
Agreed. Also it reduces costs significantly if issues can be remotely inspected and fixed. Software updates regularly get sent to new vehicles that would have cost a lot of time and money to do at a dealership.
Yes, they shouldn’t be sharing your data. Yes you should be getting compensated if you opt into data sharing.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(7 replies)
oh they pinky promised so it must be true
"GM decides to become a data broker"
FTFY
Suure they do. Maybe temporarily, but that won't last even if it is true.
I'm going to be driving my cars from 2016 and 2014 forever, aren't I?
I'd like a resource that lists each model of car and the last year they were made without data connections, or ones that depended on subscriptions that you can just decline or easily disable. I have a car from 2013 but am wondering if I should upgrade it to a latest good model before people start preferring those and the used price goes up even more.
Nah, there's also cars like mine from 2005. Plenty of em to go around.
To be fair I love my 2014 GTI and will probably drive it forever even if I get another car because it's just so damn fun.
we’re removing car play for privacy reasons!
It doesn't quit collecting and storing it
Well that’s a funny way to spell “make sure not to buy anything GM or OnStar” but I guess it’s still legible.
This might be a stupid question, but this wouldn't have anything to do with a lot of onstar units not being able to connect to 4g now that 3g is being phased out, now would it?
"for now"
There is nothing holding them back to change their decision tomorrow or next week. there are no consumer rights or even citizen rights to their own data like the EU developed in the last 10 years. There is no leash on companies to pause or continue this behavior anytime the feel like it.
load more comments
(2 replies)
This is the best summary I could come up with:
General Motors said Friday that it had stopped sharing details about how people drove its cars with two data brokers that created risk profiles for the insurance industry.
had, for years, been sharing data about drivers’ mileage, braking, acceleration and speed with the insurance industry.
Since Wednesday, “OnStar Smart Driver customer data is no longer being shared with LexisNexis or Verisk,” a G.M.
Romeo Chicco, a Florida man whose insurance rates nearly doubled after his Cadillac collected his driving data, filed a complaint seeking class-action status against G.M., OnStar and LexisNexis this month.
An internal document, reviewed by The Times, showed that as of 2022, more than eight million vehicles were included in Smart Driver.
An employee familiar with the program said the company’s annual revenue from Smart Driver was in the low millions of dollars.
The original article contains 247 words, the summary contains 136 words. Saved 45%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
view more: next ›