Buddahriffic

Yeah, talk about false advertisement!

I like that someone figured out half assing things can be just as funny or even funnier than putting in the effort to make it look more professional.

Now I'm curious about who first bottled that lightning.

Maybe the makers of Aqua Teen Hunger Force? Half the characters in there seemed like they were making it up as they went and is the earliest one I can think of where that was a common theme.

Home Movies came later but is the earliest where that's applied to media produced "in-universe" that I can think of.

Home Improvement was earlier than both and Tim was often out of his league on his show, but that was more of a "ill prepared but at least trying to be professional" act than "making it up as we go and not even trying to hide it".

Back in the day, when I fired up Mortal Kombat 3 for the snes, I'd usually end up spending more time in the space invaders game than playing MK itself, especially since the consoles kept the tuning intended to keep the quarters coming for the arcade version (first fight would be easy, next fight would be hard, then easy after continue, so it wasn't just pay to play for the arcade but pay to win).

I'm curious if I'd remember each of the codes required for the secret menus, one of which contained the mini game. Can't remember them offhand but it might be different with an snes controller in my hand.

Actually I think I do remember one of them (or maybe it's the Konami code, or maybe those two are the same code):

Up, up, down, down, left, right, A, B, A

Or maybe it was right then left. Lol I also remember usually needing to try several variations before I'd get each code correct.

I'm the type that when I see descriptions like "be the hero of your own Star Wars story" for a tourist destination, I immediately think it's going to be some cheesy oversold experience because you can't really mass produce a main character role.

First of all, just the resources that would be required for the one on one time that would be involved is unrealistic for any scale beyond small groups.

Second, they aren't like DMs that can roll with whatever their characters design; "your own story" needs to be pigeon holed into a limited set of choices they can prepare for, especially if there's supposed to be high production value involved and special effects.

Third, of course any interactive elements are going to be ridiculously easy. They'd rather deal with people disappointed at how easy it is than people (especially kids) frustrated that they can't do something.

So I knew right at the start of this video that it wasn't my kind of thing.

But this thing didn't even live up to the cheesy experience I would have expected. Seems like they bit off way more than they could chew with the initial idea but then we costs ballooned, they could only cut features and offerings while increasing the price, leaving it as an overpriced but underwhelming thing, in the end.

So much corporate shit is like this now. I think it's just another symptom of the problems capitalism brings. Under capitalism, you get a mix of people who want to do a thing and make money from it and people who want to make money and think doing a thing will get them that money. Those that are focused on the thing will generally produce something of much higher quality than those focused on the money they'll make. One asks, "is this good? Could it be better?" while the other asks, "is this good enough? Could it be cheaper?"

She touches on the other aspect in the video a bit, but could have gone a bit further (though I understand why she didn't): the misleading marketing. Social media marketers with conflicted interests between being honest with their audience and keeping the providers of the free shit happy so the free shit keeps flowing. She touches on that aspect.

But I wouldn't be surprised if some of those trolls defending Disney are paid by Disney, maybe directly maybe indirectly. I'm not aware of any regulation against hiring people to pretend to like your product online. I'm not sure that would even technically count as advertisement, if truth in advertisement even matters anymore these days.

Jenny has integrity, at least as far as I can tell. Those "influencers" that don't are scum, whether they are doing it for free shit or getting paid to do it directly.

This isn't really about safety, it's about gun manufacturer profits.

Reviews say it's adding a giant QR code to downloaded videos to get people to pay a license fee but I do not see that after downloading something just now. Though tbf, they did update it yesterday and might have removed that because of the feedback they were getting.

Permissions look reasonable to me, based on my understanding of what they need to do for the functionality, though I suppose there is potential for abuse.

It requires a companion desktop program for some streams, which did seem sketchy at first but I wasn't able to find any specific claims of it doing anything undesired, just people who noped out when they saw it wanted them to install something and others who said it does function as desired. Again, hard to say if it does anything in addition to enabling some streams to be downloaded, but I haven't noticed anything out of place on my PC since installing it either from tool-based scans or manual checks of places where malware can put itself to survive restarts.

There were also claims that it didn't work with YouTube in the reviews, but that doesn't seem to be the case for me, since it does light up. Though maybe that was timing-based, too, where Google briefly managed to block it only for them to adjust.

So I haven't seen any of those issues but YMMV. I'm going to keep using it but will also keep an eye on it. Either way, thanks for letting me know.

How so?

There's also the video download helper add-on for Firefox that will allow you to download streams that aren't just media files your browser can http get. Though your browser can still access those streams, it needs a script component to handle it, so the built in file downloader/saver won't even see it as a thing to download.

Also you can just block elements you right click on in Firefox (though this might be an option added by an add-on). If there's hidden elements you just need to go through each of those until you can click on the one you want directly (and you can tell by what is highlighted in the inspect element mode).

You can also hit delete in inspect element mode to remove that element. You can also edit whatever you want in the element. Makes me wish it existed back when I was doing more web dev work, would have made things a lot easier when debugging.

I consider the razors pseudo logic.

Yeah, if they are able to intercept traffic or access the logs, they probably already have other access to the account without needing the password. If you don't reuse passwords, then your other accounts will be safe from that.

Yeah no worries and agreed. I hate seeing commercial sites using worse password sanitization practices than I used for my first development website that wasn't even really intended for anyone else to log in to and any max length suggests the password is either stored or processed in plaintext.

IMO it should even be hashed on the client side before being sent so that it doesn't show up as plaintext in any http requests or logs. Then salted and hashed again server side before being stored (or checked for login).