extant

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Early on he would, but you are right I always suspected the account was more of a marketing firm of several people and the guy was just the public face of the account.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I don't remember him being like that early on so if he is/was it probably influenced from user interactions and let's be honest, people could be pretty toxic. I agree though about Flying Squid, they seem pretty cool.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 4 months ago (9 children)

FlyingSquid is the only one I recognize and I feel like he's lemmys GallowBoob from reddit.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (3 children)

They always rebrand features for marketing, you aren't in a video chat you're FaceTiming™. You aren't talking with AI you're talking with Apple Intelligence™.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How much the bribe is for, people would be very upset if they knew how cheap they got sold out for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Probably wipe the firmware of the machines so they can't be used.

(Fun fact: FIRMware is the in-between of HARDware and SOFTware.)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Those should be closed systems and don't need to network with other systems and should be safe enough, its when we start networking that it becomes incredibly risky which is what neuralink is intended to do. I don't think the average person understands how many automated attacks are flooding interconnected computers as we speak and you're dropping someone's brain into that and we don't understand the scope of what can be done intentionally or unintentionally, it's not outside the realm of possibility an automated attack trying to rapidly port scan and compromise a neuralink could overwhelm and damage the device and cause brain damage or death.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (8 children)

Would they still want it if it became hackable and someone could do nefarious things to them which they no doubt will try?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There's no oversight for any of these agencies and they have the means and incentive to backdoor cryptography, what would stop them from doing this morality? There's no possible way that they both aren't compromised and all we're seeing now is them firing pot shots at each other trying to convince the reader to join their honeypot because its sweeter.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The game uses archive files to package the game files and if one file changes then that breaks all the mods, and since there are several key files it essentially breaks that entire category of mod. So they aren't as crazy as they sound even if you are correct.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Bethesda games are the only games I've ever played that don't support ultrawide. Don't get me wrong I've played other games that were released without it or it was buggy but in each case I put in a bug report and within a week or a month they patched it. Bethesda must have so much technical debt and spaghetti code that they can't do it and they don't care enough about their players to even try.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Yes, I'm comparing the threat level based on the maximum potential akin to the likes of "those apps". Permissions are straightforward and will protect users just like ad blockers, decentralized static frameworks (JavaScript/CSS/fonts), and clearing cookies. But on average users are not well informed and aren't considering permissions, add-ons, or even which browser or app they use so I compare based on the potential threat level.

view more: next ›