this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
516 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

68306 readers
4344 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

European Union regulators are preparing major penalties against X, including a fine that could exceed $1 billion, according to a New York Times report yesterday.

The European Commission determined last year that Elon Musk's social network violated the Digital Services Act. Regulators are now in the process of determining what punishment to impose.

"The penalties are set to include a fine and demands for product changes," the NYT report said, attributing the information to "four people with knowledge of the plans." The penalty is expected to be issued this summer and would be the first one under the new EU law.

"European authorities have been weighing how large a fine to issue X as they consider the risks of further antagonizing [President] Trump amid wider trans-Atlantic disputes over trade, tariffs and the war in Ukraine," the NYT report said. "The fine could surpass $1 billion, one person said, as regulators seek to make an example of X to deter other companies from violating the law, the Digital Services Act."

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 30 points 9 hours ago

I believe it when they actually do it

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

What have they done to earn that fine?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Preliminary findings from july

  • First, X designs and operates its interface for the “verified accounts” with the “Blue checkmark” in a way that does not correspond to industry practice and deceives users. Since anyone can subscribe to obtain such a “verified” status, it negatively affects users' ability to make free and informed decisions about the authenticity of the accounts and the content they interact with. There is evidence of motivated malicious actors abusing the “verified account” to deceive users.
  • Second, X does not comply with the required transparency on advertising, as it does not provide a searchable and reliable advertisement repository, but instead put in place design features and access barriers that make the repository unfit for its transparency purpose towards users. In particular, the design does not allow for the required supervision and research into emerging risks brought about by the distribution of advertising online.
  • Third, X fails to provide access to its public data to researchers in line with the conditions set out in the DSA. In particular, X prohibits eligible researchers from independently accessing its public data, such as by scraping, as stated in its terms of service. In addition, X's process to grant eligible researchers access to its application programming interface (API) appears to dissuade researchers from carrying out their research projects or leave them with no other choice than to pay disproportionally high fees.

https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_3761

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 hours ago

Also interferes with our elections, which might get them banned completely

[–] [email protected] 44 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Oh noooooo 1 billion dollars.......such a heavy fine.......

Make it 60 billion.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

This would be a fine against X though right rather than Elon himself? Surely the company wouldn't have that kind of cash available and would need to take drastic action to raise that amount.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

rubbing nipples

Oh, gosh! That sounds SO bad! Go on, tell us in explicit detail all the drastic measures that X would face. Tell us all the pain they would endure! Spare no detail.

rubs balls

Yeah.....yeah almost there....

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

I don't understand the downvotes for this, this was my thinking too.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

This. Fines should be percentage of wealth. Otherwise they're just a sticker price on breaking the law.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

Nice idea but the state wouldn't be able to know how much one owns. I am poor, but I have more hidden wealth than declared wealth

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago

But $60B is more than Musk bought Twitter for, and there's no way it increased enough that $60B would be a reasonable percentage of income in any capacity.

[–] [email protected] 93 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Don't talk about doing the thing and do the thing.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

in a democracy the latter has to be preceded by the former.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago

Forgive me for being jaded and bitter about the opposition party being nothing BUT ineffectual talk.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Get back to me when they spell Billion with a T

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Tillion? Tbillion? BillionT?

!/s!<

[–] [email protected] 25 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

So a slap on the wrist? A significant one sure but just ban them if you want to be serious and make an example out of them

[–] [email protected] 18 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

but just ban them if you want to be serious

But if you ban them you can't continue to fine them....

[–] [email protected] 15 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

If you want X and other American social media platforms to keep undermining your democracies then sure just fine them. But if you want to get serious then kick them to the fucking curb

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

But if you want to get serious then kick them to the fucking curb

Absolutely, but you have to think why the European Union hasn't done this to date? It's totally within their gift to say that Twitter is such a dog shit platform that tomorrow it will be blocked, no European company can do business with them. But they don't. Why is that?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 16 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 16 hours ago

Well then do either one instead of just loudly proclaiming you might do something

[–] [email protected] 13 points 16 hours ago

I hope that after the fine goes into action he loses more investors further deminishing his wealth

does not matter to me if the actual fine is lower when in the end he pays a higher price. (but big numbers are nice so: go europe)

[–] [email protected] 17 points 18 hours ago

Why stop at 1

[–] [email protected] 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Hopefully it's a European billion (million, milliarde, billion, billiarde etc) so 10^12

[–] [email protected] 11 points 18 hours ago

Just ban the thing

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago

Good. Go ahead.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago

Oh no don’t make papa Elon cry.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 19 hours ago

don juan grabbed the wrong pussy