this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
331 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

59347 readers
4724 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 148 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Fuck Apple. They deserve 0%.

[–] [email protected] 135 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Why does patreon even need to be an app? What value does the app bring that the website can't deliver?

[–] [email protected] 81 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (7 children)

There are a lot of people out there that will not use a website and only use an app for things. I'm willing to bet there's some users of patreon on ios that don't even know there is a website.

[–] [email protected] 73 points 3 months ago (2 children)

lots of people caught mobile brain rot

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is it? A native mobile application (not a web view/PWA) will always be massively better as a user experience than anything a website can provide.

People who use apps do so because they've learned from experience that an app is far better UX than the website version, and they're not always right, but they're not wrong most of the time.

If anything, web apps are the real modernity brainrot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

OnlyFans doesn't have an app but they're still in business. We must educate people about not relying on apps for everything.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't have an app because it can't, not because it wouldn't benefit from it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

I would argue Patreon cannot have an app on the App Store as it would cause them to mess up their (and the users') business models... 30% is huge !!! I am baffled by why they would bend to Apple instead of upgrading their website.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago

definitely. i know so many people from my school who’s iphone home screen is just… pages full of apps. we’re talking 40+ apps on average. they always say it’s weird how i use a website for almost everything, and then they complain about their storage space :/

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I tend to use whatever has the best user experience. I don't use a browser for lemmy as an example.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Notifications of new content are nice.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (9 children)

There's this ancient standard called email

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago

There's also web push. You can send push notifications straight to someone's browser, no need for a dedicated app anymore. Not sure if patreon has implemented this, but they could if they wanted to.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

RSS is better suited for this.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Does this mean Patreon too will have two tiers of billing system: standard billing via the Web and slightly higher prices if done in app. I think if one purchases a YouTube Premium membership in app on iOS, it costs more than when done via the site.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Yes, that's exactly what they're doing. If you have a Patreon, you must choose between increasing patreon price on Apple specifically compared to Android and Web, or you can keep the price the same, in which case you will earn less from users using iOS in-app purchase

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Background play of exclusive podcasts for one thing. I suppose that might be possible in a browser but playing media from a media player app instead of a browser is certainly going to be a better experience.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Just offer file downloads. I swear the society is regressing technologically speaking (not aiming at you OP)

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Every podcast I support on Patreon provides a link that you can plug into your podcatcher to subscribe. I don’t need the Patreon app to listen to the podcast then, just Pocket Casts or whatever I’m using for all my podcasts.

Even the video links are YouTube links.

I don’t doubt that the app makes life easier in some ways, but the website works just fine.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

The main shows definitely that is the case for me as well - but there are also Patreon exclusive audio releases that don't go out on the rss feed for Morning, Somewhere for instance. I also follow shows with exclusive video releases on Patreon that don't ever go to YouTube and I still get the benefit of a dedicated media app with background play.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They should just take the route BandCamp takes and tell you to go to the website to make purchases

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

PWA should be the way. As long as the website is mobile responsive, PWA should be preferred in cases like this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 81 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, just give it another 7 years. This should have been an open and shut case decades ago and yet still it persists.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

This is what, the 3rd attempt Apple has made at "complying" with the 3rd party app store regulations? It's only been like a year since that's been going on. I'm sure the EU will be getting back to them about this soon.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 70 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I thought Apple lost this war already?

[–] [email protected] 56 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A few times. But the old man don't seem to learn.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago

They lost it in the EU, but did it change for the rest of the world? Can't really read from the article what region they are talking about.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

They'll hinge their position on the least good faith interpretation of EU's anticompetitive lawsuits, and why wouldn't they, they make more money in between these lawsuits than they pay EU for breaking the rules.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 months ago

Grats to Patreon and/or the EU for the easy payday🎉

[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Hold up (fta):

By this November, all creators can only offer a subscription-based plan on iOS as the app store doesn't support other formats, such as first-of-the-month or per-creation plans. As a result, Patreon is rolling out a 16-month-long migration process that will shift all memberships to subscriptions by November 2025. At that point, subscription-based plans will be the only option available, unfortunately proving Apple's far-reaching power.

I'm unclear on what this means: is Patreon eliminating first-of-the-month and per-creation plans on ALL platforms? Or just on Apple platforms?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago

THIS is why we hate Apple. Their bullshit affects EVERYONE. There is no "don't like it don't use it" with these people.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

Seems like it's a backend change and they're removing per creation entirely. Got an email from one of the creators I follow about getting suggestions on how to restructure their tiers for the new system. My guess is it would be tricky to setup a way to have creators do android/web tiers and apple tiers, not to mention confusing. And of course they can't just pull a Spotify and have a pop-up that says 'sorry you must use the web to subscribe' on iPhones.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because using a web browser is soo 1994

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They removed this feature from web browsers too. Not just the app.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Easy solution: the app only redirects you to the website via browser intent.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That is no good with Apple policy.

App cannot tell user that they get better deal anywhere.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

So wait, Apple effectively mandates that users of their store lie to their users? Wonder if that's something that can be tackled legally.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 months ago

From my understanding, thats also very much not allowed on the app store, and is something they check for.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Get this, they don't allow that either. There are multiple clips from LTT talking about dumb things like this that Apple doesn't allow

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Apple needs to be regulated

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why don't they just do what Kindle does? Say that you can no longer subscribe from the application and to subscribe from the site?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Apple has explicit rules against redirecting customers to other sites for payment. I think they have a special deal with Amazon for that wording.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

stop using apple products people

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Glad I only use the website

load more comments
view more: next ›