WolfLink

joined 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

I’m really not sure where I originally read it. I did some digging and I found some discussion about FLAC and patent trolls on a few forums, including the Talk page of the Wikipedia article, but I haven’t found anything concrete.

It might be that the patent troll thing was just a rumor!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago

I think both work since opus is the codec but ogg is the container, but personally I’d probably go with .opus because it’s more descriptive.

Btw Apple’s ALAC and AAC files are typically stored in an mp4 container but with the m4a extension to mark it as intended to be audio only (although it may have a video track, which usually is used for album art).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Yes they are no longer scared of the licensing enough most modern Apple devices do have at least some FLAC support.

Also ALAC is a free and open source codec which also has wide support.

And with a tool like FFMPEG you can easily convert between the two and they are both lossless so there is no data lost in the conversion.

So really just use whichever you like it really doesn’t matter.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

Apple made ALAC as an alternative to FLAC due to the dubious licensing around FLAC at the time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The 3D Prince of Persia games were Ubisoft

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

That’s a good point which is part of why there is a lot of active research into quantum networking. Once you can connect two otherwise independent quantum computers, you no longer have the issue of increasing crosstalk and other difficulties in producing larger individual quantum chips. Instead you can produce multiple copies of the same chip and connect them together.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Because the math checks out.

For a high level description, QEC works a bit like this:

10 qubits with a 1% error rate become 1 EC qubit with a 0.01% error rate.

You can scale this in two ways. First, you can simply have more and more EC qubits working together. Second, you can near the error correcting codes.

10 EC qubits with a 0.01% error rate become one double-EC qubit with a 0.0001% error rate.

You can repeat this indefinitely. The math works out.

The remaining difficulty is mass producing qubits with a sufficiently low error rate to get the EC party started.

Meanwhile research on error correcting codes continues to try to find more efficient codes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I mean the known theory of quantum error correction already guarantees that as long as your physical qubits are of sufficient quality, you can overcome decoherence by trading quantity for quality.

It’s true that we’re not yet at the point where we can mass produce qubits of sufficient quality, but claiming that EC is not known to work is a weird way to phrase it at best.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

And guess who constantly lobbies and sues to keep things that way?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Error correction does fix that problem but at the cost of increasing the number of qubits needed by a factor of 10x to 100x or so.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Their trackpad can and does work via USB so ???

I have one of their trackpads and it works great with Ubuntu over USB but not over Bluetooth for some reason. (It connects, but Ubuntu doesn’t handle it well.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

It comes full circle because the proposed solution is to increase the number of people who are able to work, with the idea that those people will take on more jobs, and those jobs will fund pensions.

I think this is a bad idea because we already have more workers than useful jobs. An increase in the population wont really help.

view more: next ›