we've updated our terms of service, you're now opted in to everything, good luck!
And
Yes, you unsubscribed from that mailing list, but before you did we went and put your name down for 575 new email lists which you have not unsubscribed from.
this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
604 points (96.6% liked)
Programmer Humor
19488 readers
583 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Unsubscribing from this mailing list automatically signs you up for this other identical mailing list
Unsubscribing confirms this is a monitored account, so we have sold your email address to 9 million other companies.
That first one should be punishable by flogging. Also the second one, but the first one is a very common strategy for opting you in to things you explicitly opted out of, and I'm pretty sure it's illegal. But, since no one ever enforces the law against mega corps, they're free to operate with impunity.
Excuse me, that else should be elseif( user.region != 'eu' )
elseif( user.region = 'eu' ){ SecretlyCollectData(user)}
Would be neat if Google got caught with a GDPR violation, the max fine is 4% of your global revenue, which for Google would be 12.2 billion.
So far the biggest has been Meta who was hit for 1.2 billion.
Google: "Haha, hahaha, no."
Else if (EU) {be annoying while collecting data;}
No then they just don't show you that they have your data...
That isn't real. It wouldn't pass peer review. Here is the actual code:
function GetCookieValue(x) {
return JSON.stringify(x);
}
user.cookies.agreed = Boolean(GetCookieValue(true));
if(!DarkPatternPopup()) {
// Make sure we respect the user choice
user.cookies.agreed = Boolean(GetCookieValue(false));
}
if(user.cookies.agreed) CollectData(user);
Don't need an if, just set the variable and collect the data. Saved you a jump instruction. The compiler is going to optimize it out anyway, but simpler code is better and some people forget the -O flag.
Yeah but the last requires you to explicitly distinguish between the two cases.
The only problem with the code I see is that the first 3 lines are not needed.