this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
114 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59148 readers
1986 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 36 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (7 children)

For reference, the allegedly infringing patents are these:

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 minutes ago

If these were stories I was picking up to implement I would be asking the BA to elaborate some more 😂

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 hour ago

The solutions here don't seem to really be solutions in my opinion, especially the third one. It's like if the problem a patent solves was "being able to individually package sandwiches on a conveyor belt" and the solution was "have a machine that recognizes where one sandwich ends and another begins so it can stop and start packaging appropriately." Like, no kidding, but how?

[–] [email protected] 80 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

How do these not apply to the majority of games, these sound so insanely broad. Patents are so stupid.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

They only apply to games from Japan. This is the Japanese patent system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 minutes ago

But why in english if it's (seemingly) domestic only.
Are they mandated to submit in English?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

How many Japanese games are there? Nintendo better pick up the pace.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Sony has a patent for an input device having two data streams at once

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 hours ago

usb has more i think.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Holy hell.

Even by the standard of "all software patents are nonsense", these are a fucking joke.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 hours ago

It basically hits any game with mounts or vehicles.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Hold my bacon, one can patent the idea that a game character switches mounts depending on a given state? (Image 3)

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 hours ago

Seems like it. So when you come down from the sky on your flying mount and get close to the ground, you swap to a horse mount for example.

How can one patent this.. wtf!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Software patents are fucked, ain't they? You can implement a thing using completely different code, algorithms, hell even programming languages/CPU architectures, and you'd still be infringing. There was some stupid fight over a simple slider UI element to unlock a phone a few years back.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah software patents should be like "this exact code" or something along these lines. I mean patenting "hello world" should give you billions

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago

Code is already copyrighted by default, so no need for software patents. Luckily software patents are null and void in EU, so I don't have to worry about that.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Why are there dates in the corners?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

These are the patent publication dates, for more details you can check https://patentscope.wipo.int/ with patents 7545191, 7493117 and 7528390

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

These look like they are after Palworld was released. Was Nintendo just sitting on the patent since Pokeman red/blue? What an unintuitive legal system they have over in Japan.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 hours ago

Looking through the first one's content and it seems reasonable? The patent's abstract is supposed to be as widely applicable as legally permitted, so it's like a completely different language on top of legalese.