this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
960 points (98.4% liked)

> Greentext

7452 readers
57 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 157 points 1 year ago (4 children)

"went home, kicked sarumans ass for good, and then got to slammin...

Oh right, the whole battle of the shire isn't a thing because some dork chopped it and Tom bombadil completely out of a movie script.

What? No... I'm not bitter... much

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago

They're saving it for the sequel, "The Shire, An Inconvenient Truth"

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's still hope for a Tom Bombadil miniseries that resurrects those scenes. Whether it would be good is TBD, but maybe Amazon pulls an Andor and gives somebody the creative freedom to make it that way.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Amazon's made some half-decent shows, so it's not completely unrealistic to imagine ...

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"So we decided not to actually read any of the lord of the rings books and instead imagined what a guy named Tom Bombadil would be like and thought up some zany adventures for him to go on. We really think the audience will respond to his soon to be famous punch line, 'Gabbana doodle muk muk.' Ahh old Tom 'Cheddar Cheese' Bombadil what will you do next? That's right we gave him the nick name Cheddar Cheese, people are going to love it."

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

‘Gabbana doodle muk muk.’

Not too far off from the way he talks in the books, honestly.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Amazon has made some decent shows, but has Amazon made any decent adaptations? Rings of Power wouldn't be completely awful for example if not for the butchering of the pre-existing lore.

Vox Machina is the closest they have, but that's kinda cheating, the VAs who originally created and played the characters in DnD are, naturally, the VAs for their characters on the show.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is The Boys not an adaptation? I’m not a viewer, but I could swear I’ve seen a comic version of it at my local bookstore.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair, I forgot about The Boys. That being said, it still has the issue of not following the source material very strictly, it's just that in this case it benefits from that. As far as "edginess" goes, the show is a dull butter knife and the comic is a freshly sharped sword.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

A dull butter knife covered in tomato ketchup.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know if you would call it Amazon's as it originally started at SyFy, but The Expanse was amazing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, people forget there was a whole public begging of the audience for Amazon to save the show since they already had some distribution rights. It was a little desperate for money.

But the other thing is that Amazon still never really made the show, Alcon still made the show, in house production and payment and then Amazon was just footing the bill by paying for sole distribution rights. It's not uncommon but it wasn't Amazon's show

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk, I do wish Tom bombadill was in the movie since he's probably my favorite character, but I was fine without the battle for the Shire.

It just seems too much too briefly even in the book, I think it would have been very difficult to include that organically in the movie.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like Tom Bombadil is an interesting mystery in the universe, but they're pretty easily cut out of the story without changing anything really other than getting rid of the question of "who's this weirdo that the ring doesn't affect?" The Scouring of the Shire is also arguably cut pretty easily, and I get why a lot of people don't like it, but it seems more important to the themes in the book and to show how the heroes have evolved since they were last in the Shire.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm also fine with Tom not being in the movies, for exactly the reason you're saying.

I also selfishly want him on screen just to stare at, I'd love like a whole 45 minute cutscene or entirely separate production laboriously following the details of his actions and behavior that are in the book. I don't even care that his ultimate nature is a mystery. Honestly, I just love his buoyant singing and style.

Did you read that theory about him being the song of the ainur? It's a great read. One of the nerd of the rings or other fans do a summary video of it on YouTube if you want to cut down the reading time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I also selfishly want him on screen just to stare at, I’d love like a whole 45 minute cutscene or entirely separate production laboriously following the details of his actions and behavior that are in the book. I don’t even care that his ultimate nature is a mystery. Honestly, I just love his buoyant singing and style.

That's totally fair :). You like what you like! I haven't heard of many people who are big fans of Tom Bombadil, but it makes me happy to know you seem to love those chapters!

Did you read that theory about him being the song of the ainur? It’s a great read. One of the nerd of the rings or other fans do a summary video of it on YouTube if you want to cut down the reading time.

Yes, I've heard this theory! Honestly, when I first read the books I didn't really appreciate Bombadil, and I think this helped me appreciate them a lot more. I think how weird Bombadil is made them hard to read for me. They're so unexpected that it's almost hard to fit them in your head and have a clear mental image of what's going on, you know? Also I just find songs hard to read... Which is problematic for these particular books, haha.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I totally get what you're saying, his presence is a bit of a non-sequiter in the flow of a grand adventure getting underway.

I had the opposite reaction upon meeting Tom for the first time in the books, reading the Lord of the rings the first time was not exactly boring but felt more like a chore than many novels I read(and I do feel like if I went through them again, I'd enjoy them more now), but the section where bombadil showed up is like this bright light in my memory where some indefinable quality of the story fell into place for me and just made sense. I don't know if it's the musical nature of the elf language songs in every culture or how important nature is to the world without any obvious deities or practices of worship in the lotr,, but when tom showed up I instantly felt like "oh, here he is", and although I never got an answer regarding his ultimate nature, it always seemed like he played this indispensable role inside of that musical natural world.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah. I think if nothing else it does really stand out! It definitely feels like it's really important and significant... But in a way that sort of isn't to everything that's going on in the story? Which I guess is kind of exactly what Bombadil is... They're some ultimate power that's just there, but doesn't really care too much about the goings on aside from in their little insular region. I think it didn't really sit well with me that Gandalf was like "no, Bombadil won't really care about the ring," though... Because I think when we encounter Bombadil they're a little sporadic, but they clearly care enough to help all of the main characters and didn't really seem inattentive in any way to me.

I had read the books after I had already seen the movies so I was kind of confused when I first encountered Bombadil. I imagine that makes them stick out even more... Makes Bombadil seem weirdly non-canon, which is a bit of a shame, I think.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The first time I read the books I only got to a little after bombadil. Maybe halfway through fellowship, and then I quit.

And then the movies came out and I was like. Oh yeah this is way easier.

But then I was teaching a student who was obsessed with the books and had read every tolkien work related, so I finally went back.

And it's so funny. You mentioned that quote by gandalf because again I had the opposite reaction. When gandalf said that Tom wouldn't care about the ring, I just had this feeling of "Well of course not, that isn't his concern."

I just had this bizarre connection to how peculiar though powerful Tom was, I guess.

Yeah if they find a letter in 20 years that tolkien wrote to his editor that tells them to just take Tom out of the final draft because he's still figuring out what to do with him ultimately, I would think" Oh of course, that Tom guy is practically an anachronism in lotr."

Structurally, sure, take him out, but for just my feeling of the whole world, I do like enigmas and idiosyncrasies and Tom is a haiku in a hurricane.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

You should get to grey havens after carrying this pai n inside you for 20+ years