this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
1004 points (98.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

19817 readers
66 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 95 points 8 months ago (9 children)

I've been halfheartedly saying I'm going to start a religion based on ads being bad for one's soul. It makes more sense every day.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago (3 children)

How do you intend to acquire a congregation?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If he tells you, he'd be advertising and that's against his religion.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago

Just live the principals and you're already a congregant, my child

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

That’s not advertising, that’s prosthelytizing. Advertising has to be for goods and services. And just telling someone about something isn’t advertising. It’s when you spend money or resources to bring attention to that thing that it counts as advertising. People keep saying that putting a sign on your building stating the company name is advertising. It’s not.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Seek and ye shall find.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

well, they just picked up one follower.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (3 children)

By advertising. So it is now officially a religion since it's full of hypocrites.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Checkmate, atheists!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

is there public awareness that isn't advertising?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Yes, this isn’t advertising. It’s proselytizing. Advertising has to be for goods and services and it has to be explicit. Me telling you about the company I work for isn’t advertising.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Thit's nit idvirteesing...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Lmao

I don't, i suppose

Word of mouth & direct delivery tablet cuneiform maybe, go old school

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm a convert. Who wants to write our hymns?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Glory to Ublock on high! May it's righteous code bless our browsers for all eternity.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Unlock Origin*

From now on, referring to it incorrectly is considered herecy and punishable by up to 17 whip lashes.

Edit: not gonna fix the typo, I'll take my lashes

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I was about to join untill the whiplashes. I prefer something bit more laid back

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps we can interest you in some gentle tongue lashes?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

ooh sounds like me to myself when I'm having doomsday hangover. I'm in

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

do it so we can claim anti ad blocker measures are discriminatory

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Your move Satanist church.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

"The real money is in starting a religion." - L. Ron Hubbard

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

You too, Detective

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Please add me to that newsletter, and may the billboards be cast from your sight, brother!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

With that, you could sue Google and other companies pushing anti-adblocker tech for discrimination, just bring up all the cases when the supreme court sided with cristofascists to oppress other people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

I'll subscribe