PlantDadManGuy

You're arguing in bad faith and I'm not going to put up with your stupid straw man. Your statement was that it requires 700 kilowatt hours for a single transaction and that is blatantly false. You seem to ignore the obvious fact that Bitcoin can be transferred unlimited number of times and you do not have to re-mine the Bitcoin every single time you transfer it. As I said earlier, I already agree with you that Bitcoin sucks and you're wasting your time arguing with me over semantics.

He is wildly incorrect because he phrased it in an intentionally deceitful manner. It does not require 700 kilowatt hours of energy to transfer one Bitcoin one time. The verbiage quote "single transaction", is the entire problem with OPs post.

I'll bet you three double stuffed Oreos it's stalled before the inauguration.

You have no idea what you're talking about, or else you're intentionally misleading people. Transferring Bitcoin in a single transaction takes nowhere near as much power as mining it. Yes, BTC is stupid and terrible for the environment, but you don't need to lie about the stats.

Women's suffrage was ratified in US constitution 1920. But probably not for much longer.

You know there is still time to snatch up a fantastic Toyota GR Yaris and elevate your life!

I find it kind of reassuring that at least our votes actually mean something to someone and the entire process isn't completely rigged, otherwise no one would fucking bother.

Yes it seems like that should be the duty of a functional government... Oh wait...

When did customers become consumers?

If only our fucking government would do something about this and actually regulate these evil bastards.

INTERNET SHOULD BE A PUBLIC UTILITY! SAME AS WATER, TRASH SERVICE, ELECTRICITY AND GAS.

I'm not a lawyer but this sounds like a pretty textbook definition of fraudulent business practice to me.