Doctor_Satan

I spent years installing hardwood floors. Now when I see them, all I can see are the flaws. It's maddening.

It's not something I can always tell "instantly", but lack of curiosity. I can overlook a lot of flaws, being a very flawed person myself, but someone who isn't curious about the world around them is an absolute waste of time, and no amount of physical beauty can make up for it.

The servers in the local resurant here have a small tablet and can just look this up on the fly. No need to memorize anything. Not quite sure about the allergens, but that could easily be solved with software.

I can see how this could be a required skillset for a waiter in a super high-class restaurant where it would add to the prestige and professionalism, but in a average restuarant I’m totally fine with the waiter having a look at the tablet before answering a question about the menu.

At this point you could just have a tablet at the table and let the customer look it up themselves. In the mean time, for restaurants that don't provide tablets to their waiters (which is most of them), this is a skill they need.

I guess being annoying is a skill. But I absolutly fucking hate when people do that. The job is to take the order, not suggest one.

Again, outside of super-fancy restaurants, I’d think that’s actually quite inappropriate.

This is specifically a waiters job. I love that you think you've never been sold anything at a restaurant. Those waiters did a good job.

The entire fake-friendly act with a fake-smile is a very annoying American thing. Your job is to take the order and bring the food. After that I really don’t want to hear anything else but “Enjoy your meal” and “Was everything alright?”. Talkative waiters are the worst.

Hate it all you want. That doesn't change the fact that it's part of the job for American waiters. They don't have the luxury of not having to be friendly.

Mechanics don't qualify as unskilled either, since they require education and certification. They fall under "skilled trades". My brother is a mechanic (a master tech), and he's done probably 10+ years of schooling, and has more certifications than I can recall. He's one of like 3 people across 4 counties that is qualified to do everything he does.

But yeah, I don't like the term "unskilled labor" in any context, even if it's technically accurate in some cases. It feels dismissive, and many of the jobs it's used to describe are the backbone of a functioning society. Honestly, I think we need to just do away with the value judgment terms like "skilled" versus "unskilled", which only perpetuate the division of the working class.

What if we categorized all labor on a tier system with no implied superiority of one tier over another, just clarity on pathways to move from one tier to the next? Here's a rough idea:

Tier 1: Specialized Service & Essential Labor

• Jobs that require training, adaptability, and situational skills but not formal education.
• Examples: Waitstaff, retail workers, janitorial staff, delivery drivers, housekeepers.

Tier 2: Technical & Trade-Based Roles

• Jobs requiring certifications, apprenticeships, or vocational training (but not necessarily a degree).
• Examples: Electricians, plumbers, EMTs, pharmacy techs, truck drivers (CDL).

Tier 3: Associate Professional & Supervisory Roles

• Jobs that may require some college, specialized training, or years of experience in Tier 1 and/or Tier 2 roles.
• Examples: Restaurant managers, IT support, paralegals, bookkeepers.

Tier 4: Degree-Dependent Professions

• Jobs requiring a bachelor’s degree or higher, often with licensure.
• Examples: Nurses, teachers, engineers, accountants.

Tier 5: Highly Specialized & Advanced Credential Roles

• Jobs requiring advanced degrees, residencies, or elite training.
• Examples: Surgeons, research scientists, professors, aerospace engineers.

A lot of places won't even hire wait staff without prior waiting experience, so "entry level" still doesn't cover it very well.

Maybe "specialized service work" or something.

There's a lot more to it than "carrying a lot of plate at once".

First, you have to memorize the menu backwards and forwards. Not just the items, but also the ingredients and the cooking techniques. A customer is allergic to everything in the nightshade family. Do you know what you can't offer them? Better learn it. Someone has never eaten smoked chicken and is concerned with the pink color of the meat. You better know how to explain the smoking process and how it affects meat color. What is the temperature difference between medium and medium-rare? Are your oysters local? What's in rice pilaf? Why is it called "she-crab soup" (it's not why you think)? You have to know all of this and about a million other things, and be able to recall it on the spot without hesitation and with full confidence, every time someone asks.

Second, you have to be a salesman. You need to be able to know how to convince people to buy something that they may not have considered buying when they walked through the door, and you have to know that they will not only thank you for it in the end, but financially reward you for it.

Third, you have to be cool under pressure. You might think you are, but until you've worked a dinner rush, you have no fucking idea. It is non-stop, go go go, and you need to time everything just right. You'll also be talked down to by customers, yelled at by cooks, burned by hot plates, sexually harassed by both customers and coworkers, while fielding complaints and mistakes, and you have to do all of this while looking like you're having the time of your life. A sour expression or a snarky comment will get you pulled from the floor, and if you're waiting tables in the US, there goes about 20% of this weeks income.

Fourth, you need to be able to get along with everyone, or at least be such a convincing liar that Ted Bundy would be impressed with your sociopathic people skills. I am not kidding. You have to be able to ingratiate yourself like family with the drunk college bro table just as well as the black church group table. If you aren't a social chameleon, you need not apply.

I could go on and on, but I hope you get the idea. Waiting tables is not easy, it's not "unskilled", and it takes a very specific personality type to do it well. The job has a high turnover rate because most people can't do it.

Both. It's actually funny. Someone posted that image of alternatives to things like Reddit and Whatsapp and Google, etc, and it had Lemmy on it. I was at the point where I was getting sick of Reddit and had one account banned already. I joined Lemmy, and a few days later my other account got banned for up voting a comment that was just the gif of Luigi (the Nintendo character) smoking a cigarette. I had already decided I liked Lemmy more at that point, so whatever. The one thing that sucks is that I had my own little sub with a couple thousand members where I posted my writing, and people seemed to like it. I enjoyed sharing my stories with all those weirdos, and now I can't.

Goddam what an obvious fucking name. If you wrote a procedural cop show where the child traffickers ran a site called KidFlix, you'd be laughed out of the building for being so on-the-nose.

You are working under the assumption that these "pedo hunter" groups are all acting in good faith and on good information. I encourage you to do some reading. There are many cases where these groups pretend to be 18 year olds, lure an unsuspecting person into a meeting, and then lie to their audience about the age they originally claimed to be online, as Xatolos has pointed out.

Lots of them do it to lure in and attack LGBTQ+ folks, while others act on false accusations they receive from third parties:

Innocent dad tortured and killed by group of chainsaw-wielding ‘paedophile hunters’
A gang of vigilantes tortured and killed a father of eight as they tried to force a confession out of him for crimes he didn't commit.
The case of the brutal torture and murder of Bradley 'BJ' Lyons, which shook Australia in December 2018, is once again under the spotlight as a jury has brought to justice the gang leader, Albert Thorn, and some of his mates who helped during the hideous attack.
Mr Lyons was referred to the gang by his wife Jana Hooper, who had falsely accused her husband of sexually assaulting two of her teenage daughters.
Thorn, the leader of the vigilante gang with a specific hatred for paedophiles, was found guilty this month of the torture, imprisonment and murder of Mr Lyons. Later this year, he will face a pre-sentence hearing.
Two other members of the gang who took part in the ordeal, Jordan Bottom and Rikki Smith, were found not guilty last week of the killing of the father.

And I can't tell you how many times they just straight up confront the wrong person. Here's one example, and here's another, here's one more, and here's yet another.

These are not professionals. They are YouTubers looking for fame and relying on outrage and violence to get it, and they all-too-often don't care who gets hurt or killed in the process.

Some of these "pedo hunter" groups have attacked completely innocent people where the accusation of someone being a pedo was completely unsubstantiated. This is the problem with monetizing vigilantism: It creates a demand, and if that demand is not being met by a supply of actual criminals, then it will be filled by vigilantes criminalizing innocent people.

I had two main accounts. My oldest account got permabanned for a joke about Nick Fuentes. After his address got doxxed and he pepper sprayed a woman who rang his doorbell back in December of last year, I said "hey as an incel he should be happy that the ladies know where he lives now so they can share a cocktail with him", and I added a cartoon gif of a Molotov. It was obviously a joke, but they said it was "promoting/glorifying violence". I ate the bullet on that one because they were technically right, even if they were a bunch of humorless twats.

My other account got banned about a month ago when I up voted a comment that was just a picture of Luigi Luigi (the Nintendo character) smoking a cigarette. Again for "promoting/glorifying violence".

Elon Musk is a weak little crybaby and Steve Huffman is a pathetic coward.