this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
365 points (92.7% liked)

Technology

59123 readers
2310 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sceptical. With all the added complexity of a foldable, the specs are probably gonna be below average to absymal. I'd love to be proven wrong tho.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Dunno man samsung's mid range phones are exceptionally good.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Is that before or after you remove all the extra crap that Samsung shovel on it?

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (23 children)

Every person I've known who has owned a foldable has had it eventually break because of the fold. We try to keep moving mechanical parts out of tech for a reason. I've never had a smartphone 'suddenly break' like a printer or car.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

This might be a bias. I've had a foldable for two and a bit years now, no issues aside from I hate the camera, but that's always been a constant

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The glass "runs out" of flexs.

I've had 2 for a year each and no major issues. Now that this one is just out of warranty and working towards year 2 guess I'll see. I love the sheer size of the screen so much.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My Fold4 still looks new, and it's been a year now since I bought it. I use mine both as phone and a laptop replacement.. Sure inner screen is more fragile but also more protected when closed. You do have to set your expectations right. Definitely not a phone for people who don't take care of their own devices. But at the same time, device doesn't break by opening and closing it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do you use it as a laptop replacement? What tasks are you doing on it that would otherwise be done on a laptop? I feel like its too small, it would only replace phone tasks for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Whilst i might be biased, my samsung fold 3 has been fine for 2 years. My mum and step dad have had the flip 2 and 4, a colleague at work has a gold 4 and two colleagues at qork have a fold 5 each.

No issues at all.

I would argue that you have also formed a bias based on people you know who perhaps dont take care of their insanely expensive phones.

Although saying that, I've dropped mine multiple times, onto wood flooring, ceramic tiles, and tarmac (i practically threw it onto the tarmac when something scared me). Amd all it auffered was a few scratches and dents on the edges. Both screens are absolutely fine.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's so prone to cracking along the fold, though. You should either get the extended warranty or treat the phone as disposable, because it will likely not last more than a couple of years.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Every single person who I’ve known or seen with a foldable Samsung has a prominent fold (enough to lift the top layer of the screen) or crack.

The tech just isn’t there yet.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not a screen layer, that's the screen protector. You can remove it. It's just some plastic

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Samsung advise not to remove the screen protector, ironically because doing so can damage the screen.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

extended warranty

All they have to do is say the magic word: "Cosmetic"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Still have my Fold 3 which I got 2 years ago, it's definitely more fragile so if you're prone to dropping your phone maybe don't get it but it's not as fragile as people make it seem. It's not for everyone for sure but damn is it convenient and useful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Have been using the flip 3 for a couple years.

I love the small design. Is it a Gimmick? Yeah probably. Do I like that Gimmick? Absolutely. It would he difficult to go back to a big ass phone. Routinely carry it at work by the ring on the case. Removes my need for a watch since I can easily reply or answer when it's closed, control media, etc.

Love to see more unique smart phone options. The phones were too samey for too long. This budget option could help that innovation even more.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

I had to jump back to a standard phone after both my flip4 hinges died on me, it was hard but I'm pretty much used to it, haven't tried to fold it in half in a week, so that's good.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is the screen holding up?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Same here. I don't understand why everyone in this thread is talking about cracks and creases after it was fixed in the generations following the first.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I was looking at the bigger foldables and came to the reality I don't need it. Ended up getting a RAZR+. I'll never be able to go back to a full size phone now because of the size. I've just gotten used to using the outer screen and hope this size keeps getting better.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago

Samsung Gameboy PS

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago

I'll adopt it once it's reliable enough that it won't crack along the screen.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Would rather have a new Samsung phone that's tiny

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

At last. Price has been the biggest barrier for most people

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I think this would be awesome if they used the same aspect ratio paper does, 1 to 1.414, so you could open the phone and have a phone in the same aspect ratio but larger. You know, if we're going to keep having nonsense screen aspect ratios where you can't watch any videos without black bars or zoom, you might as well do something fun with it.

Edit: it's also really stupid that we've seen phones go from being folding, to smartphones, to slowly getting larger and taller over the years, to the point where now people are jonesing for this simply so they can have a more compact phone again. I doubt for most usage you're going to use the inner screen at all, there's pretty limited potential there in what you're watching and doing. Watching a video is probably gonna hit you with omega black bars. Only way I see this making any sense is if you have a classic square to real phone clamshell design, GBA style rather than DS style, but that still doesn't make that much sense to me.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Thank goodness. I'm sick of having a huge phone.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd love the idea, but graphene os support is my requirement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Love to see more foldable options!

load more comments
view more: next ›