dm_me_your_feet

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 119 points 11 months ago (10 children)

I just quit cold turkey and moved to lemmy fulltime. I miss some communities but whatev, its no biggie.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 year ago (22 children)

I'm sceptical. With all the added complexity of a foldable, the specs are probably gonna be below average to absymal. I'd love to be proven wrong tho.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

How many times do we have to go over this? Just don't fuck with my hardware post-purchase with sketchy updates.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What monopoly? M$ revenue + Nintendo revenue = Sony Gaming revenue

If anything, playing field just got level, as M$ post merger will be about the same size Sony is.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Activision waa such a piece of shit, I m actually very excited for this. They shitcanned Bobby too. It can only get better.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Check this out:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Schrems

Facebook (and the complicit Irish Data Protection Comission) thought so too, an were rekt.

The case invalidated 2 seperate "safe harbor" agreements between the EU and the USA, making ANY data transfer of EU customers private data to the USA illegal without explicit consent. It was literally pandemonium in the IT sector for a few months, everyone was running stuff in US clouds and panicking.

This is what makes the EU high court (ECJ/EuGh) special: noone can pressure them politically. They couldn't care less what anyone but EU law says.

And that was "just" GDPR, now they have way more EU laws (DMA, DSA) they can throw at FAANG.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Under GDPR and DMA, there would be real consequences. Like "being broken up or cease to exist" magnitude of consequences. Why would they risk it for the 1% of users who actually care and set their privacy settings accordingly?

Google doesnt care about you or anyones personal data. They care about the amount they collect. If the most privacy-aware users wrestle back some data and have it deleted, so be it. Google couldnt care less. Users are like cattle to them, as long as the general "data harvest rate" looks okay they wont investigate the odd one out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Matrix can kinda emulate this kind of "all messages in one app" experience with bridges but you introduce a single server who decrypts all your end to end encryption so you pretty much have to self host. Also the bridges arent perfect so your msgs will sometimes look weird or not support some features.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I used it too. I miss it, but i get why they removed it: it just kinda breaks the Signal user experience and trust model. This app lives and dies by the users trust their conversations will be private. By having an option to message someone in a completely unencrypted, easy to intercept mode like SMS it risks this trust for little gain (some power users like us liked it). By removing it, the app concentrates on what is expected from it and removes a big possibility for user error while fleshing out its marketing image even more. It makes perfect sense but its a tad annoying.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

iMessage will have to open up bridges to other messaging services soon regardless thanks to being a Gatekeeper under the EU Digital Markets App.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Get a 10GbE nic and OpenVswitch

view more: next ›