sugartits

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think climate change will top that list soon.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Some people really will believe anything, as long as you're trash talking big tech. And this platform is particularly bad.

Just say something like you should be paying for YouTube (via ads or premium) and brace for the swarm.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

We were supposed to stop?!

[–] [email protected] 160 points 2 weeks ago (61 children)

What? No. What utter nonsense.

I should be able to remove a website that I created and paid for without there being some silly law that I have to archive it.

As the owner, it's up to me if I want it up or not. After all, I'm paying for the bloody thing.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

Just buy an older supported device if grapheneos is important to you. Something like a 6 pro would be fine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why did a moderator remove my comment?

Do you want this place to die? Because excessive moderation is how this place dies.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (11 children)

It's not even that.

There is a huge lack of insight into who owns the copyright of an NFT. This confusion likely stems from the fact that an NFT comprises two things: (i) the identifiable, non-fungible, non-replicable, and transferrable cryptographic asset recorded on the blockchain, and (ii) the creative content. The creative content is separate and distinct from the actual asset recorded on the blockchain. As such, the person or entity that created the creative content owns the copyright. The content creator continues to own the copyright, even if the NFT is sold to someone else. It’s analogous to Jeff Koons selling artwork he created—Koons can sell the art to one person to hang on their wall, but since Jeff also owns the copyright, he can sell that same artwork as an image on t-shirts.

https://bpp.msu.edu/magazine/nfts-what-you-need-to-know-to-protect-copyrights-june2022/

NFTs are literally just URLs, pointlessly stored on "the blockchain". URLs that point to servers which can be switched off at any moment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

GeckoView more specifically in this case. But yes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sure you can. Car manufacturers do it today.

You will have to define "3 years" as well. It can't be a blanket 3 calendar year thing, it would have to be X number of cycles which the average user would realistically hit with 3 years of usage. Not someone glued to their phone playing games all day that need to charge three times a day.

view more: next ›