this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
35 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3580 readers
216 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The number of young people not in education, employment or training has risen to unacceptable levels because Whitehall is failing to listen and respond to their needs, Andy Burnham will say this week.

The mayor of Greater Manchester will warn in a key speech that the number of “neets”, which now stands at almost 1 million - the highest figure in 11 years – will continue to rise unless the Department for Education (DfE) adopts a new schools policy more geared to their requirements.

Over recent weeks, government ministers have attempted to make a “moral” case for welfare cuts and changes to the benefit system, partly by highlighting the number of young people who are not in employment or trying to get work, and instead are living on benefits.

Based on experience from Manchester, Burnham will say that one of the main causes of this is a school system that fails them and is overly focused on the traditional university route, rather than catering for the requirements of those who want to pursue technical paths.

He will say that schools in England are judged by Ofsted on their performance against the English baccalaureate (EBacc), described on the DfE’s website as a collection of GCSEs “considered essential to many degrees”.

He will argue that this has left England with an education system designed for some but not all young people. In Greater Manchester, about two-thirds do not pursue the traditional university route.

...

The neets rate has remained at 12% or higher for several decades. According to labour market statistics published by the Office for National Statistics in February, the UK unemployment rate for young people aged 16 to 24 was 14.8%, up from 11.9% the year before.The problems is bound up with ethnic inequalities, with young people from Black Caribbean backgrounds having a neet rate more than double that of young people with white British backgrounds. Regional inequalities are also substantial, with neet rates of 15% in the north-east of England, compared with 9.4% in the south-west.

Results from a recent survey of schools in the Greater Manchester region based on 100,000 students reveal that many young people are losing their sense of connection with school as they progress. While 67% of pupils told the #BeeWell survey that they felt a sense of belonging in year 7, this dropped to 51% by year 10. About 64% of pupils reported “good” wellbeing in year 7, compared with 55% in year 10.

...

To balance the EBacc, Burnham and his team have developed a Greater Manchester baccalaureate, or MBacc – a selection of subjects linked to seven sectoral gateways to the Greater Manchester economy. The ambition, by 2030, is to provide a high-quality 45-day work placement for every young person who wants one, linked to T-levels and BTecs.

He will call on the DfE to change schools policy and bring in a principle of parity between academic and technical education and the devolution of responsibility for the post-16 technical system. He will say: “Different regions of England have different economies and therefore it stands to reason that post-16 technical education is a prime candidate for devolution. The Department for Education’s long-running resistance to this is a significant barrier to growth.”

The mayor will say that the country’s failure to tackle longstanding problems such as the rise in neets is a reflection of the top-down way in which it has been run. Burnham will call for radical change in the architecture and culture of the British state, with the new devolved bodies across England being given a much greater role in setting direction.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

Go on, Andy!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (4 children)

If he didn't hate parliament with a passion I'd say he's a natural leader for labour

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

He already ran for leader twice...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Selfishly I kinda want him to carry on as mayor of Manchester for now, he's been doing a lot of good here and I worry that whoever follows won't be as effective

Although it makes sense for him to go for the big job one day, there's no guarantee the skills transfer

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

It's not that he hates Parliament but The King in the North won't ride south again until he is guaranteed victory. He's taken two shots at the crown and lost, he won't abandon his power base until Labour pretty much beg him to save them and the country.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Seeing as how he was literally on officer of the conservative party until he left whichever of oxford or cambridge he went to I would say you are spot on.

Of course, as red tories, the labour party's fitness to oppose, or represent anybody is another question.

The choice is an opposition to the conservative party that actually represent the interests of former working class people, or the likes of pro-Russian reform/trump-types coping into power sooner rather than later.

Get real and take your pick.

I guarantee there are a whole load of people in the US who identify as 'left' who wished someone had got real in previous years and decades.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

🙋‍♂️