this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
315 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

65819 readers
7247 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

this corporation surely won't be like the others

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 minute ago

I fully expect them to go the way of the others into time it's just halfway usable for the moment and it's what's absorbing Twitter refugees. We should always keep in mind that any usability is temporary

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 hours ago

As long as they only allow left leaning propaganda then its okay.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yet they still think it's a good idea to limit text posts to 300 characters for reasons I cannot fathom.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 23 hours ago

It's a Twitter-like replacement. That model clearly worked for a lot of people, why change the formula?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So what is the character limit you consider acceptable on Bluesky?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I don't see value in a character limit other than whatever might be needed for technical reasons. Bluesky allows alt text for images to be 2000 characters, so clearly any technical limitations allow at least that much.

For those who prefer short text posts, hiding posts longer than a user-configurable setting behind a "see more" link would do.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah there's no good reason for a limit. Having no character limit doesn't stop people from making short posts if they want. If they don't want long posts taking up half the page, then they should just hide the rest of the text behind a 'see more' prompt once it goes over 300 characters.

On a platform like Bluesky I can kinda understand if they limited replies to posts to 300 characters, so that people don't get walls of text in their inboxes but the original top post should be unlimited IMO.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Bluesky aims to be a Microblogging, although its protocol can be used for other types of social networks. They may increase that limit a bit, but the fact that there is no character limit is more likely to be found in another social network that uses the protocol that Bluesky does.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I think the idea that forced brevity is an important component of microblogging is mistaken. Low friction to post, minimal formatting, and (optionally) collapsed long posts in feeds all encourage short posts without requiring them.

It might have served more of a purpose when Twitter launched because people weren't in the habit of short text posts at the time, and because Twitter supported posting via SMS.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I think the original point was to facilitate a noisy town square feeling. In that setting, you don't have several paragraphs to get your point across, you need to condense your thought to a couple sentences or you'll get lost in the sea of other voices. You bring handouts (links) and something to show (images) and that's it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

There is a chance that I just don't get microblogging. I've always felt that short character limits encourage people to make bad points that resonate emotionally but fall apart when thought through, and to yell at people they disagree with rather than being thoughtful.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

I agree, which is why i don't use Twitter/X, Bluesky, or Mastodon. I prefer the Lemmy/Reddit style of medium-length, topic-centered discussion.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Still nothing to address discoverabilty issues. There are timelines that no one's maintaining and some packs and thats it? On mastodon I can just follow a hashtag and find people on Bluesky my feeds are just random low effort spam with a gold nugget once a while.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

I really don't understand why I can't just follow a hashtag, it's such a basic feature.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago

Following hashtags is just the best

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

idc about bluesky until it doesnt cost millions to selfhost

[–] [email protected] 8 points 21 hours ago

They were running everything on a single rack during the first big rush.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Love bluesky!