this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
422 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

58947 readers
3912 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 day ago (5 children)

If you're still using Chrome it's a you problem.

Firefox + ublock origin + SponsorBlock for youtube is great. Works on mobile too!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago

It works on Android, but I don't believe it works on iOS.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

To add to this- playback also continues with the screen off too. So ya, ff mobile with those extensions is basically yt premium XD

[–] [email protected] -1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

firefox doesn't support HDR

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I've been using a chromebook for the last 4 years and it's been great for my needs (youtube, streaming, porn, etc), but I am shopping for a windows machine now because fuck google.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

I'm not too familiar with chrome books, i know some of them are insanely locked down to prevent this.. but see if theres a linux distro compatible with your chromebook, and if its possible to slap a linux install on it.

save you having to buy a new machine, possibly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Thanks choom, you reminded me to reinstall Sponsorblock.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The other day I got to pondering whether people who work for ad serving companies have ad blockers on their work computers.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

I used to work for an ad heavy mobile game and ad serving company couple of years ago, and I had ad blocking at dns level in my house. It blocks not only ads, but also most tracking and telemetry. My bosses wanted to know why my devices were not displaying ads or dialing back to home, they were pretty fucking puzzled. They were terrified others like me were around. Basically their entire business model depends of people not knowing how to block ads and telemetry

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I didn't other than for testing, in fact I had to research and figure out ways to bypass ad blockers, to prevent social icons from being blocked etc. I even wrote that company a brand new admin website to replace their old one, they liked it so much that they laid me off a few months later even though they were already underpaying me because they wanted someone cheaper to maintain it, after announcing they had record-breaking year-over-year profits. I found a 30% higher paying job a few months later and been there since. lol

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You won't get me off adblock, as of recently i've come to find we get significantly more ads compared to friends and family.

My dad plays wordfeud, so i install and play a set with him...about 5 seconds in i get frustrated at the 4th ad and my dad goes: "which ads".

My friends keep telling me i'm taking the youtube ads far too serious as they are only 10 seconds and show it to me too.

My youtube ads are 1 minute unskippable blocks before and after 1m 51s videos. I'll get a 1min ad block halfway into a 5 minute video even though youtube themselves claim they don't do that.

How the fuck am i so fucked when it comes to ads, my dads phone is almost completely ad free. Heck the google top suggestions that are basically paid for ads don't even show up on his phone.

He can play those free apps (advertisement feeding software) without getting any ads and he's adamant his phone isn't modified.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I wager your dad has a subscription or something he doesnt want to admit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 49 minutes ago

It's with all those silly free apps tho, sometimes i'll go there and have some fun game which he installs on the spot...no ads.

So it can't be with the apps itself.

Heck i've burned myself on a couple of those games where i would go: "i've played for weeks, might as well buy out the ads and save myself the headache" and it will still have ads, for power ups or some other similar things.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If you use android, just use adguard private dns. It will get rid of third party apps ads. For youtube you need revanced or newpipe

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 minutes ago

I tried setting it upfor my router.

But the insteuctions just go: "change ipv4 to x" and "change ipv6 to x".

There are no ipv4 or 6's so i need to add them, but it won't let me add without a specific name but it doesn't give me any requirements for the name.

So i'm stuck.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Eh, I haven't seen an ad on YouTube for years, I just use uBlock Origin on Firefox and they're all gone. You can also do that on mobile as well.

That said, I use Grayjay on mobile because it eliminates ads and also lets me sub to videos from other platforms. I have a few subs from Odyssee, one from Rumble, and a half dozen or so from Nebula. None of them display ads, and I only occasionally have some weird issue where a video doesn't load (usually just close and re-open the video and it works).

The DNS option is nice if you use an app that you don't have any control over, but for videos and regular web browsing, you can just use an ad-blocker.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Opera browser? The one that everyone was making a stink about a few years ago? The one owned directly by a Chinese based company, and was supposedly sending telemetry to China?

Why the hell would anyone still be using Opera???

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

I stopped using Opera the second it wasn't Norwegian. I use Librewolf on desktop, Waterfox on mobile and Vivaldi as the "clean" browser when something k. Waterfox/Librewolf fucks up an important webpage I have to use

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The link you shared is the company profile only and doesn't mention any controversy about telemetry being shared with China.

I've been googling for a bit, and there are articles concerned this might happen from 2016 when the takeover was announced, and plenty of discussions on reddit, hacker news, y-combinator, quora and even on the official Opera forum (not deleted or redacted, mind you), but there wasn't any clear evidence that telemetry is being shared.

While the concern remains valid, I'm also asking myself whether it's that much worse than Chrome, Brave or Firefox sending telemetry to the US? I'm neither American nor Chinese, and would consider both governments hostile. Which one of them has access to my data is merely a choice between plague and cholera.

So in the end it's on informed users to block transmission of telemetry themselves, regardless of their browser of choice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

The link you shared is the company profile only and doesn’t mention any controversy about telemetry being shared with China.

I want to upvote this.

and would consider both governments hostile.

I want to downvote this.

So I guess I will do neither since I can't do both.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I would rather give my data to Firefox than a company who's entire business model is selling user data. That being said, you could use librewolf which removes telemetry. I use both Firefox and librewolf

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It seems that many people here are not aware of how much Mozilla depends on Google, so switching to them is a small consolation. Maybe it's time to support the development of new engines like Servo and Ladybird more. Servo even recently released an Android version (currently not very usable, but I downloaded it just to show support).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, but it is still the most usable alternative we have for now. I would avoid stock FF and use either Librewolf or hardened FF because the default browser spies too.

Really have hopes for Servo/Ladybird!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

Of course, I also use LibreWolf, Mull... but we expose ourselves to security risks this way (as is currently happening with Firefox and Mull), and besides that, you have to trust projects more and more whose code is not reviewed as thoroughly.

[–] [email protected] 151 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A reminder that Opera is owned by a Chinese public company. I wouldn't trust the browser for privacy reasons.

[–] [email protected] 76 points 2 days ago

Not even just that, they also have a history with making loan apps with predatory rates. I wouldnt trust them even if I was a member of CCP.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago (3 children)

s/owned by a Chinese public company/proprietary/

Although another problem is that it doesn't bring anything new to the table. Yet another chromium browser with built-in proxies and data collection 🤷

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 118 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Opera is not a trustworthy browser and there has been no point in it existing since they stopped using presto.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Exactly. I used Opera until they dropped Presto and went back to Firefox.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A better title: Opera explains shit on how it plans to keep uBlock Origin support. Will talk to developers so see if anyone has a good ideas.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They mention that the shared codebase means they can add functions back in, so there's that. To me that reads like a hard fork that they'd have to maintain independently.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I guess the current situation could be better if Opera and Brave coordinated among themselves a shared codebase for a patch that would allow both of them to keep v2 working. The thing is that Brave most likely doesn't actually care, they've a built in adblocker so if v2 goes away then their marketshare will increase. Opera can't do it alone because, well it is the Opera Chinese owned company after all.

I was really hopping that Microsoft would take on this, think about it, from a strategic PoV if Edge kept v2 and advertised it they could just snatch a big chunk of users from Google.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 days ago

Just use Firefox and its variants for more privacy. Done. Chromium is a dead road. Even with ungoogled chromium , brave , etc you have to trust the maintainers and their compiled version.

[–] [email protected] 173 points 2 days ago (24 children)

I truly hope this leads to the collapse of Chrome's sheer market dominance. Fuck Google.

[–] [email protected] 73 points 2 days ago (19 children)

If every single person that uses adblock decided to move to Firefox because of MV3, it wouldn't make a single dent in Chromium's dominance. We vastly overstate the amount of people that even know what an adblocker is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago

Even here on Lemmy, where most people are tech-savvy, a disturbing amount don't use adblockers. I've seen so many posts of people complaining about ads and they always have comments with people agreeing. A lot of the time they've got some completely illogical and stupid reason for it.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Nah it would make a big dent for sure.

Firefox has ~180 million users

Amount of users using adblockers is ~900 million.

It would massively change the market.

Numbers according to mozilla and statista

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 days ago

That's true. 2 years ago, I come by my friend's house for a drink, and his kid is watching cartoons on YT. My friend's been a gamer for +20 years. Spent most of his life around PC. All of a sudden, I hear ads.

What's that? What? What's with the ads? Oh that, that's YT.

I know it is, but what's with the ads? Well, they have ads. I know they do, but why do you have them...

Installed adblocker for him, he's looking at it in shock. I'm looking at him shocked...

People have no idea, what we take for granted. 😅

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] [email protected] 83 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They explain nothing. They're in the same boat as all others: open source will let them keep MV2 longer than mainstream chrome, but that future is uncertain as the main project codebase starts to evolve around MV3 and backward compatibility to hack MV2 back in gets lost over time. Nobody here can make promises, and sites that make that make those judgments are naive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (8 children)

serious question: how does opera (the company) make money?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago

originally? a paid product. now? crypto!

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›