this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
96 points (88.7% liked)

Technology

58115 readers
3920 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago

It doesn't protect anyone from hate speech.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Instagram and facebook isn't protecting anybody from hate speech

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But how can I make it about women issues then?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Women are more likely to experience gender-based bullying than men. Men gets bullied too but they are rarely targeted specifically because of their gender.

The article really didn't have to only focus on women but it's also somewhat valuable insight.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Instagram isn't protecting anybody from hate speech. They don't give a shit.

Unfortunately, no matter who you are, how you or others label you, some people will hate you purely for who you are, and Meta doesn't (and will never) care.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Maybe unrestrained capitalism wasn't such a good idea...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Meta enccourages it. It drives up engagement which means more ads viewed and more data gathered.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Are men being protected from hate speech or something?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

No, but they should be able to take it, they rule the world after all. /s

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

TBH I've never experienced or even seen any meaningful "misandry" online. It's a fake cause promoted by grifters, misogynists, and pals.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Women Politicians. What a category to hide Kamala's name behind it. But it's not just "women politicians", Instagram isn't protecting women in general.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's not just about Kamala. Fash didn't really care about Kamala before she became nominee b/c she's basically fash too.

It IS actually about women politicians (no quotes needed), especially anybody who deviates from the fash agenda. These creeps have been going after AOC for years. Not to mention other minority women like Cori Bush and Ilhan Omar. These women have been under attack for way longer than Kamala. And, unlike Kamala, they will never be mentioned or protected at all.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Dear Wired Magazine ; water is wet.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Of course it isn’t