Idk where to start.
Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics.
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
Weirdly, I'm now drawn into seeing how expensive they actually are.
Maybe it's actually marketing genius. 🤔
I’ll start. Ahem. What is she leaning on? What cables are they talking about? Why are they expensive? Is it good that they’re expensive?
I’ll stop there, and see myself out
White font on white shirt?
The confusing messaging certainly takes second place behind that bad typography.
This ad is not for consumers. The line "征求经销商" means "looking for retailers"
You know you can change the typo in the title right?
But then people won't flood to the comment section to correct them
Political campaign ads. Not a product so it might be different. I remember watching one that took advantage of homeless people and it made my stomach hurt.
There was an ad recently on UK TV for some shitty food delivery company,and had a constant loud doorbell sound.
I emailed the TV channel and said myself and everyone I know have stopped watching their channel because the advert was so obnoxiously irritating.
They emailed back a month later and said they'd asked the advertiser to redo the advert due to multiple complaints
We can make a difference if we make an effort!
Wendy's had a recruitment campaign "a job at Wendy's serves me right" and I could not think of a job there as anything other than a punishment for something
You know what you did
Papa John's always showed some of the most revolting looking pizza in their ads, and I know ads are usually doctored to make the food look better so if that's what it looked like in the ad there was no way in hell I was coming into one of those places to get a pizza.
Gillette had an advertisement and it was a bunch of different hot men lined up and a woman fondling their bodies, evaluating what trimming style she found most sexually appealing. They were encouraging you to buy their trimming products.
I just thought, let's flip it around. There's a bunch of busty and tight women in swimsuits, and a man comes and lustfully fondles their bodies, and then they're telling you to buy makeup.
Edit. I should add that this was what made me decide to just stop buying their products. It was just one commercial, and I'm not making a big whoopee about it, but it motivated me to make a change and there's no reason to go back. I pretty much realized through this that I don't need any of their products that I formerly used, and I can shave myself for pennies versus what I used to pay them for disposable blades.
I just thought, let's flip it around.
This is how you best determine the presence of gender bigotry.
Take the genders in contention, and swap them. If the skit or saying or phrase or whatever no longer “reads” exactly the same as it did before, then the “inoffensive” version is nothing more than gender bigotry being aggressively whitewashed.
Example: “kill all men” ↔ “kill all women”. Do both sides read the same? Are both sides taken to be “equally offensive” by most of society? No? Congrats, you have correctly identified the left hand side - frequently lobbed about by a majority of female supremacists as “a joke” - as being a whitewashed example of gender bigotry. And mercy upon the soul of anyone who utters the right-hand version, such is the severity of how offensive society sees it as.
I can shave myself for pennies versus what I used to pay them for disposable blades.
Safety razor, FTW. Blades are cheap, I can shave myself daily for five years for the same price as a 16-pack of replaceable Gillette razor heads that barely last me six months with only thrice-weekly use. And I have a straightedge for dealing with neck hairs during the winter when I let my beard grow out, works wonders in giving me a clean edge to my beardline. If I take care of it well, I could pass that straightedge down to one of my grandnephews in near-mint condition.
I think any ad that has the disclaimer guy say about 300 words within 3 minutes at the end has a place in my worst ad bucket. These are mostly drugs. and I don't remember a single specific so it's a sure sign.
also those smiling people eating their salad.
and that one ad with iPhone that people are jumping about with colors splashing and so little detail on the actual product.
The law on drug ads is that if they tell you what the drug does, they also have to tell you all the side effects.
But if they don't tell you what the drug does, they aren't required to say the side effects.
So they used to make two versions of the ad. One that was all about making people feel good about a drug by showing smiling happy people living a good life with lots of wholesome moments then "ask your doctor if zexophlam is right for you." Then they'd have another ad that tells you what zexophlam does and send a few minutes listing the side effects. But lately I haven't seen the second type that lists the side effects. It;s just the first type that doesn't tell you what the drug does.
Last one I saw kind of made a joke about it where someone is about to tell you what the drug is and they keep getting interrupted. Haha, how clever you are in avoiding telling me that a pill can give people diarrhea or whatever.
All the anti-smoking ads. I don't support smoking, but the anti-smoking ads are so dramatic I'm surprised they're allowed by the Geneva Convention on psychological warfare.
And the real world affect of those ads were they just reminded smokers they hadn't had a smoke in a while and they'd go light up.
Now Im reminded of he Thai Insurance ad
Rama margarine
Every 90s ad looked (almost) like this. At least in my country. Cringe times.
We might not live far away... this one was the cringiest to be honest, the others ones, not as much. But this... I do eat margarine, but after seing this, I never even thought about buying Rama ever again, though it has crossed my mind before I saw this ad.
Not gonna lie, I kinda love it.
I feel like any ad you remember isn't the worst.
The point of ads is to entice you to buy sonething. Theres a higher chance of me buying something I dont remember the ad for than one that I make a point to avoid because of how terrible the ad for it was.
You got it! Aside from anything seriously offensive, these are ALL better ads than the ones we've completely forgotten about.
Crazy frog. Advertising what, a ringtone? I stopped watching television and never really started again.
Every grammarly as that has the English mistake in it.
So, all of them.
Any ad that runs on youtube. Literally. All of them. You have paid for the privilege of ruining my enjoyment of whatever I was trying to see. Eff you and the product you rode in on.
The Quiznos ad with the talking chinchillas.
Most people didn’t even know what those things were. I heard them being called weasels and rats and deep-fried hamsters and even beavers.
But, no. Photos of chinchillas, with talking human mouths superimposed. Ended up being the most fingernails-on-a-chalkboard commercial I have ever come across. Sure, there have been worse commercials in terms of raw stinkers or stupidity, but this one was by far the most repellant one I have ever personally experienced.
A few years ago, Skittles had this ad with a dancing elf looking dude. I used to love Skittles, dentist will back that up, but i just couldn't support that kinda nonsense.
#2 would be those Quiznos ads... I wouldn't eat there anyway, but the deep-fried hamster looking thing isn't going to convince me.
It was an election poster. The slogan (translated into English) was "Forbid Crime!"
Any of the ads that have started autoplaying when I turn on my FireTV Cube. It pisses me of so much I'm actively avoiding the shows and movies they're promoting.
Turn off the auto play video option in your settings. It used to be off by default and got turned on in a recent update.
You are my hero, I looked for something like that but hadn't found it. Thank you!
there was an old ad with a kid sitting on a dock fishing, eating a bologna sandwich and singing "my bologna has a first name, its o-s-c-a-r. my bologna has a second name its m-a-y-e-r"...
nothing wrong with the commercial except it turned out to be an ear worm that would live in my head FOREVER. my brain trots it out at least once a month for no good reason. usually more.
ive never bought bologna and i'm low key mad at Oscar Mayer so maybe this counts?
That Wendy's ad with the meme guy that I wanna strangle. Haven't eaten at Wendy's in like 8 years because of that ad
Eats spicy goodness
Like a boss
An ad for Descovy, an HIV prophylactic, that they kept playing in Portland in 2020. You gotta step up… PReP UP!! It featured this super creepy dude who I guess was supposed to be gay and kept making eye contact with the camera. I felt like I was being stalked.
HEADON
Literally any ad. I hate advertising in all forms and it does nothing but piss me off. If your ad is intrusive enough, I'll remember it well enough to never buy your product.
Jimmy John's, Carls Jr..
Immudefense. Whenever I see this I feel second-hand embarrassment for those people standing there shaking that stupid little pill.
Every single billboard for Paramount+ is just six shows that don't interest me at all.
Like how can your streaming service be worth it when you don't even have enough content to fill a poster.
i disliked an ad in tv before 2000 and decided to not buy the deodorant stick then because of that. like 10 to 15 years later i accidently bought the product- long forgotten that this was the one with that bad ad and actually liked the product and bought it regulary for some time (then remembering how bad that ad was, but okay the product was good actually). that was until they decided to put more plastics into packaging as well as less content into it (same price for package) just to make it more costly for me thus more profitable for them, whilst producing more litter and destroying more resources just for profit. The higher price would not have been too bad, but creating more litter for more profit made me then search a better product. then found a bio product with all natural contents, very few plastic packaging and even less pricy.
That ad made me NOT buy it. So that was the worst ad i've ever seen in two ways: it reduced my willingness to buy their product to far below zero lasting for a decade and i did not even want to try the product that i later found to be actually good, so worst case for the vendor AND the customer.
However that product later also had the "best" Price raise (by less content) for me ever as that made me search and find the then newly existing even better and more natural, less pricy product of their competitor.
Maybe good CEOs are rare.