this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
990 points (93.7% liked)

Technology

60080 readers
3354 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Alternative conspiracy theory, he got paid to do that, as twitter even with all the bad things was a political tool against fascism and misinformation.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe, but I do think he's dumb and egotistical enough to lack self awareness.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

He was backed by the Saudis. This money is nothing to them. They win if Twitter profits, they win if Twitter burns. I don't thing they care.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Frankly there is no alternate conspiracy that can make this make sense. Even if the point is destroying Twitter, why does he have to be the one to personally take the reputation hit? He could downright hire some celebrity CEO to say and do all the shit he wants done, get all the flak while he relaxes on a yacht. There may or may not be backroom deals but he's still being a chump for exposing himself like that. His business are taking hits because he's seen as increasingly unreliable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even if he loses al his companies he still has money to live on that yacht for the rest of his life,(doubt it as USA is practically funding him), he is a narcissist he wants the attention, he wants people talking about him.

But any guess is as good as mine, maybe he is the Manchurian candidate maybe not.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I think he's just proof that money doesn't make people immune to internet brain rot.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's no way he would've willingly taken a hit to his reputation like this

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really don’t understand this take at all. He just seems like a straight up fool to me. Even if he was coerced into destroying Twitter, why do people seriously go, “Oh no! There is literally nowhere else to have these kinds of discussions or rallying!” When there are in fact PLENTY and could even be MADE for these kinds of situations? Look at the Fediverse for example, but why stop there? You’ve got other silly social media sites that can be used the same way if someone actually tried hard enough. If those don’t work out, you can always find a way IF you truly do care enough.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really don’t understand this take at all.

Reddit just like Lemmy it's not an accurate representation of reality, yes you are all tech experts, you use Linux and Lemmy, opensource software and hate the system, the average citizen uses windows, spends his time on TikTok, meta or whatever, they will use whatever is convenient for them.

if someone actually tried hard enough.

People try hard enough all the time, just not in your virtual bubble.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Reddit just like Lemmy it’s not an accurate representation of reality

Thank you for reminding us. This place can be a bit crazy sometimes, and reddit too.