this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
87 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4341 readers
153 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 42 points 4 days ago (6 children)

The best way to defend a country from the US is to not engage them in traditional warfare but use guerilla tactics until they give in and go home. They've lost multiple wars this way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah best get building your rainforest back up

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 days ago (3 children)

But also to not have multiple US military bases already on British soil.

I’m not a military person, but I feel that could be seen as tactically unwise…

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago

This is what I was saying to someone a couple of weeks ago when Musk was talking about liberating the UK.

They don't need to invade us, they're already here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

The chances of a future where the UK and USA go to war where those military bases aren't long since gone is nearly impossible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Dont they technically own those bases? They ones i remember were very explicitly named RAF (Royal Air Force), don't know about other US branches presence

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago

If they’re full of US military personnel, does it matter who legally owns the land? 😉

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Unfortunately even then the M.O. is to flatten half the country, dismantle any existing government, then half-heartedly declare victory before leaving any survivors to clean up the mess.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like US domestic policy

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sound like the American War of Independence against The British

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Time truly is circular

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If they invade the UK we're just going to throw all their bud light in the sea. See how they like it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago

The sea will throw it back

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

This is what the US have encouraged Taiwan to do. Taiwan wanted to purchase a few incredibly expensive fighters and ship from the USA, but basically all war simulations just had China target these and secure a fast win. The USA instead encourage Taiwan to take the "porcupine" technique, spreading many small weapons, particularly handheld anti-aircraft type weaponry across the country. The plan is to make invasion too inconvenient. The flip side is that without a reliable way to show a display of strength, anywhere the larger aggressor does pick on (USA to UK China to Taiwan) can focus on one part of the country and reliably cause massive damage there.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

how should i use this info if I'm already in the us