this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
63 points (82.5% liked)

Memes

45550 readers
724 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (9 children)

The bias is justified. The left is correct. Markets don't create wealth without necessarily simultaneously creating poverty

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For more information, research "surplus army of labor", "primitive accumulation", and "accumulation by dispossession".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Primitive accumulation is a bad term. It works if you've read the theory behind it, but otherwise it sounds like someone saving up a bunch of money then starting a successful business compared to what it is which was colonial genocide, enclosure of the commons, and mass starvation as people were ripped from agricultural labor and cast into the factories and mines to work for feudal lords turned industrial capitalists.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree but in this context I'm literally telling them to read about it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I was just summarizing for the people who are too lazy to go read anything and will just stop here

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (29 children)

Well that's just bullshit. Markets have brought more people out of poverty than anything.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Capitalism literally requires poverty to even function.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Lib - "Markets make everything cheaper, which is good."

Leftist - "But if there is a labor market, won't that make labor cheaper?"

Lib - "Yes, and that is good."

Leftist - "How is that good?"

Lib - "It leads to more profits."

Leftist - "But why is it good to have more profits?"

Lib - "Because a good country is when corporations make profits, and the more profits the corporations make, the gooder the country is."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Love to spend insane amounts of resources on creating a phone that has the same tech and capabilities as all the other phones, but I can't just get access to their research and they can't just get access to mine.
Love to spend insane amount of time working up a cure to covid, but I can't share my research with others and they can't share it with me, yay this is awesome.
Love to spend insane amount of resources working out how to make people want to buy a sugary drink and then spend even more to make them want to buy my drink specifically.
Love to build empty houses and love to create 1.21 times more food than we need.
Love to do all this as the world is burning and people are starving.
Capitalism is the most efficient distribution of resources

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, but please don't say that too much, we don't want to carry water for the CCP

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think you got the joke

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah it completely wooshed over my head, I thought you were serious

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No it hasn't, socialist agitation in the teeth of capitalist opposition did that

Without it westerners would still be working 16 hour days seven days a week without any safety nets while dying of lead poisoning

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Wrong, that would be China, under the direction of the CPC denguin

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Deng literally introduced market reforms to do so. This is not the own you think it is

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For the sake of simplicity, please enjoy the following meme:

deng-cowboy

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Obviously it is a counterfactual but no serious leftist would say that China without market reforms wouldn't have eradicated poverty, and moreover done it faster and more completely. The seeds of poverty alleviation were planted during the Maoist era; improvement in health, education improvement, and industrialization.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

To corroborate your point you can just look at life expectancy in rural communities to see that it rose steadily throughout the Maoist period and then froze during the Dengist reforms

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Markets have brought more people out of poverty than anything.

Yes, just like the Irish people who were "helped" by the free market in the 1840s. Or the Indian people who were "helped" by the free market in the late 1800s. You might be interested in this book by the late, great Mike Davis which completely refutes your ideas with hard evidence that the free market can be used (and has been used) as a tool of genocide: https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/7859

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

thinking-about-it You can't be poor if you're dead

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)