Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54500 readers

695 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Regarding mullvad (lemm.ee)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hello all,

I am running fedora with mullvad (wireguard) straight from the network settings with a configuration file.

According to https://mullvad.net/en/check everything is fine but I want to know if I am set for torrenting now that they have removed port forwarding and I cannot bind qbittorrent to the vpn.

Should I adjust anything or am I set? What was the benefit of port forwarding?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Any suggestions?

I checked out IVPN but apparently they disabled that feature as well.

Is proton the only well regarded vpn that still supports it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

azirevpn.com is the one I'm on at the moment. Dunno if it's well-regarded but it seems good enough for my purposes. As well as Proton there's also Airvpn. If all you need it for is torrents then getting a seedbox is another option.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Seed boxes don’t do as well to hide your privacy as a vpn

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

AirVPN is excellent

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Private Internet Access still has it

Edit: People got issues with PIA? I've been using it for years and it works brilliantly while still being one of the cheapest on the market.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They're owned by a sketchy company. Worth looking into, but the general advice is to stay far and wide away from Kape Technologies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I remember the purchase a few years back but PIA was still proven to not keep logs and be just as secure, no?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Might be the case, and most probably true. But not a risk I'm taking, also not giving that company my money.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

I use PIA, and have for years as well. My only complaint is they semi-promised they'd have a WireGuard config file available years ago, and we're still waiting.

But as long as you can run their client, you can utilize WG, and it's still the cheapest option that offers no logs, split tunneling, port forwarding.