Actually I can read this. Apparently blocking instances doesn't block their comments in communities that aren't hosted on the blocked instance.
tatterdemalion
joined 1 year ago
That's a good point. Honestly I didn't notice all of those posts were from a single community, though in hindsight that makes a lot of sense.
Not because I've had any kind of bad experience with users on this instance, but I don't care for the posts on lemmy.blahaj.zone. I honestly just got tired of seeing the "Rule" posts; it's like 90% of their posts!
Rate-limiting could also be applied at the federation level, but I'm less sure of what the implementation would look like. Requiring filters on a per-account basis might be resource intensive.
Why resort to an expensive decentralized mechanism when we already have a client-server model? We can just implement rate-limiting on the server.
No I'm pretty sure that the DNR prohibits hunting to specific areas on public land.
That just sounds illegal.
Sitting for that long is bad for you, regardless of the chair. Get a standing desk.
It seems irrelevant whether this person is using encrypted channels if they failed to maintain anonymity. If they distributed material and leaked any identifying info (e.g. IP address), then it would be trivial for investigators or CIs to track them down.
I've had two boards from them and both have worked without any issues and my last one was in service for 10 years.
In Settings > Blocks > Blocked Instances
I think it's just the communities that don't appear.