mokus

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

The trick with that test is that they’re not looking to see whether you can do it. They know you can’t. They’re looking to see whether you think you can. If you show signs of believing it’s possible, that’s probable cause for a search. If you believe you actually pulled it off, you’re drunk.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

I actually just started learning C++ today.

If Lovecraft were alive today one of his stories would start with this line.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 months ago (5 children)

What’s Elon?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Just not that one

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Reddit, is that you?

[–] [email protected] 59 points 6 months ago (5 children)
  1. Job security
  2. its not COBOL
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

My god it’s full of bees!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

In my experience, this often doesn’t happen. So many developers are either inexperienced or cowboys, and there’s nothing inherently wrong with either. But at places where projects are small and numerous, teams often end up with nothing but a combination of the two.

As one of our office’s engineering “fixers”, I’ve taken over maintenance of several such projects. They usually have shattered remnants of code taken from other projects, open source libraries, internal libraries, stack overflow, and so on. Whole source files copied into the project, modified in ways that introduce impressive new failure cases while failing to add new functionality, and used in ways that completely ignore the features natively implemented in that code while those same features are bodged in as barely-working piles of if statements, balanced on a knife’s edge to avoid triggering the failure modes added by the project’s modifications of the copied code. I’m usually able to purge 20-30k lines of code from such projects in the first month, simultaneously closing multiple outstanding issues the PM had been led to believe were intractable.

That probably sounds like arrogance and/or shitting on everybody else’s work but it’s just reality at many workplaces due to a pace driven by unreasonable expectations from management. I just happen to be the person here that ends up sifting through the wreckage when a project reaches the inevitable osteoporosis phase, because of a natural disposition for reverse engineering. It would be great to escape for this and other reasons, as far as I can tell, most places aren’t that different.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I spent way too long wondering what it could possibly mean to deduct your mortgage from your rent.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

A white with basalt? How gauche.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Pick it up after he throws it and throw it back!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)
view more: next ›