ech

Well, good thing this is c/mildlyinfuriating and not c/legallyinfuriating.

Changing their minds...shows they probably don’t know what they’re doing or believe in at all

undermining the very idea of a company like Apple running a streaming platform

I'm not sure in what way it was suggested that Apple was "different", but to clarify, companies don't do things for "ideas" they do things for profit. If it increases that profit, they "believe" in it, and if it doesn't, they'll kick it to the curb.

And not only is Apple no different than any other company in that respect, they are pretty much the top-tier example of it. They're a $2 trillion company, the biggest in the world. They didn't get to that point focusing on the greater good. Nothing is more important to them than their profit.

Dude thinks he's so important that he can bully others into getting what he wants just by threatening to leave. Here's hoping the EU calls him on it. What do they have to lose? Twitter brings no value to anyone other than Musk these days.

Easily shakes off being hit by vehicles multiple times.

I'd say Scream veers much closer to satire than parody. It's more focused on the commentary than the comedy. It does make use of comedy, but it's not solely focused on just that.

...all yours.

Not Elmo. Elmo is a delight. Musk is a sentient trash heap.

"Required cookies" is already a category, under which a cookie could be placed to remember your choice. But that would be counter to their interests.

It's sad to see companies' malicious compliance working. They make it tedious so users get exasperated with it and just accept it.

11 is the youngest. Goes all the way to 26.

Little known fact - there's more the one person out there, and, those extra people have lots of differing opinions!

I guarantee their original goal didn't include "and now only stupid clients will work with us", which is my point.