Ok ya pedantic fuck. I edited my comment just for you. I know English is hard to understand.
baggins
joined 1 year ago
Correct, that's exactly what I'm saying. Zero is the acceptable number, so anything that gets us closer to that is good.
I'm sorry to hear you're having trouble with logic but it's not complicated. Zero people should be killed by cars, therefore anything that gets us closer to that ideal number is a good thing.
You missed the part where this was specifically about their car dragging the person for 20ft after the crash and pinning them under the wheel?
That's not what I said though.
It's ridiculous to think that cars shouldn't be killing people? Well smack my ass and call me an extremist.
What's the acceptable vehicular homicide rate? GM seems to think it's more than zero.
Emphasis goes on "even though".
As in "At GM we're so benevolent that we're doing a software update even though we think this will only kill someone every 10m miles (which we consider an acceptable murder rate for our cars)".
Apparently GM thinks killing a pedestrian every 10 million miles is acceptable?
I'm misusing "acceptable" because you think I mean something that I didn't mean? Move along then.