this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
128 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59148 readers
1986 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Cruise recalls all self-driving cars after grisly accident and California ban | All 950 of the General Motors subsidiary’s autonomous cars will be taken off roads for a software update::All 950 of the General Motors subsidiary’s autonomous cars will be taken off roads for a software update

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Apparently GM thinks killing a pedestrian every 10 million miles is acceptable?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

GM saved like $2 on an ignition switch and killed 13 people. They knew about the issue for years. So yeah, GM doesn't care if a few people have to die in order to turn a profit

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/27/business/13-deaths-untold-heartache-from-gm-defect.html

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (10 children)

What's acceptable?

Every 50 million? 100 million?

It will never be perfect, and there will never be no deaths at all, so if there is no acceptable limit you may as well ban self driving car research right now.

The rate of pedestrians killed in 2021 was approximately 1 in every 25,000,000 miles driven manually (8000 deaths and 203 billion miles travelled collectively. Should that be the minimum target?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It would be interesting to see what the actual stats are for pedestrian deaths vs miles driven for non autonomous cars. I'm willing to bet autonomous cars will ultimately be safer, but it will take time to get to that point.

Edit: Apparently, according to the transportation safety in the US article on Wikipedia, the average is 1.25 pedestrians killed per 100 million miles driven.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That page doesn't exclude commercial road vehicles or interstates, so the apples to apples comparison may be much closer to the autonomous rate. A 700 mile/day truck cruising I-40 through the desert is going to skew the data as safer while I bet a casual city driver will be an order of magnitude more dangerous. Maybe the best would be stacking it against taxi and other ride-hail drivers

Edit: Cruise didn't even cause the incident. A human-driven car hit the pedestrian into the Cruise. This sky-is-falling reaction was started by a human doing worse.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

GM was just getting it out of the way, that's all. Nothing to see here. They operate better under pressure, see. Right? Sure they do.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But they recalling the vehicles so clearly not.

Unless you're suggesting that the software update is too make the cars more efficient at killing pedestrians?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

No they don’t which is why they suspended all vehicles pending a software update.

Also, how does this compare to human drivers?

The best thing about this is that now the problem has been identified the software can be fixed and this particular problem won’t happen again. If a human makes this mistake you can’t push an update to fix all human drivers.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (21 children)

What's that rate for human drivers?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Around 1 per 100 million miles.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

In all weather conditions. Autonomous vehicles only drive in optimal conditions, humans have to suffer whatever nature throws at us.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The irony here is that the accident occurred because a human driver hit this pedestrian first. So it ain’t like us humans have a clean conscience here…

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a trolley problem of sorts. Currently it seems that we have higher standards for AI than humans. I bet that even if AI was twice as good driver, we'd still hate to hear about it causing accidents. I'm not sure why that is. I'm wondering if it has something to do with the fact, that there's really not anyone to blame and that doesn't fit with our morals.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Because corporations running AI means the first time actual human thought enters the picture is when the dividend check gets deposited.

And shareholder profits, sacred in law and the market, will push safety standards based on cost, not fewest deaths.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

According to these numbers 1 death in 73 million miles. Which is much better than I thought.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Which includes trucks hauling through unpopulated areas

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not just GM, if you tried ro question the safety of these cars on even Lemmy before these revelations came out you would get brigaded by people claiming they were safer than humans statistically and thats all they needed to be in order to be acceptable.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

This incident started with a human driving their car into a pedestrian. It's not exactly a smoking gun