Thorny_Insight

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Knipex pliers wrench gang

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

The one I live in: Finland

The only thing I don't like is the short summer and long winter but I try and convince myself that it's the 4 distinctive seasons and the shitty winter that makes me truly appreciate summer. It's also good for the human character which probably partly explains why we've been voted the happiest country in the world who knows how many years in a row. It may be less true now but it's still in our genes; in the past you better be nice to your neighbour because once the winter comes and food runs out, your life may depend on them.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Why isn't there more incel violence?

We conclude by offering one hypothesis as to why modern day incels are not as violent as we might expect. The Male Sedation Hypothesis, that online virtual worlds, such as pornography, may pacify the potential for violence among sexless young men, providing a counterfeit sense of sexual fulfillment and reducing motivation for real- life mate competition.

So in other words; in the past such men would have taken their frustration to the streets. Gathering into groups of other such men and causing trouble, kicking grannies and such. Nowdays they instead retreat into their mom's basements smoking weed, playing video games and watching porn.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 weeks ago

I bought a pick-up truck because I've wanted one ever since I was a kid and one day I just realized I'm an adult with money and I can buy whatever I want.

Well I started my own business a few years later so it turned out to be quite useful purchase in the end anyway

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

I would notice but what I would be even more concerned about is how they got into my house

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Well, I'm on Lemmy myself, so perhaps that's some sort of an indication of where I prefer to discuss thing with people in general, not just about AI. My list of blocked users is rather vast though, so a big part of the loudest haters are being filtered out from my feed. That surely contributes to the better experience here - or atleast less bad.

Definitely prefered it over there at reddit, but I'm a man of principle so I'm not going back either.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Well I'd say that for a person to be evil they'd need to be doing evil things with the sole intention of causing harm with nothing good coming out of it. Perhaps a good caricature of an evil person would be someone wanting to destroy the world including themselves. Admittedly such people absolutely does exists so maybe that debunks my own claim.

However if someone draws joy from causing harm to others I wouldn't still call it evil but more like extreme disregard; you don't care how others feel, only how it makes you feel. This is why I don't think billionaires abusing the system for their own benefit makes them evil because causing harm is a byproduct of their selfish goals but not the intention of them. Similarly someone like Hitler wasn't evil either because causing suffering to the jews was not the reason he set up the death camps but rather a way to achieve his other goals.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

No, but probably the dedicated subreddit

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

I couldn't think of a worse platform to try and discuss this topic than Lemmy. The consensus here is essentially that big companies = bad, AI companies = big, and thus AI = bad.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Well first of all, I don't personally think evil even exists.

Secondly, I don't think these people are any more or less "evil" than the rest of us. They just operate on a much larger scale that affects many more people. If any of us normal folk would be put under equivalent level of scrutiny as these guys with journalists combing thru our every social media post and paparazzis following us around combined with the intention to dig up dirt and contribute to the negative narrative that sells better than a positive one, we'd all look like them. Most people don't like Gates, Musk or Zuck because that's the conclusion they've independently arrived at. It's how they've been told to think by the media.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

Reading this message chain makes me want to buy ones.

 

Feel free to define "average" how you see fit. This isn't about debating what is average person. Comparisons to the averages in your age / friend group are fine too.

 

..and do you think that you posting it has a positive, neutral or negative effect on the world?

By content I mean what ever you're posting online. The pictures you post on Instagram/Pixelfed or messages you're writing on Lemmy, YouTube comment section, Facebook and so on.

If you look back at what you have posted in the past year for example, do you consider it to be the kind of content that you would gladly consume if it was coming from someone else? If not, then why are you posting it in the first place?

 

This could be a tool that works across the entire internet but in this case I'm mostly thinking about platforms like Lemmy, Reddit, Twitter, Instagram etc. I'm not necessarily advocating for such thing but mostly just thinking out aloud.

What I'm imagining is something like a truly competent AI assistant that filters out content based on your preferences. As content filtering by keywords and blocking users/communities is quite a blunt weapon, this would be the surgical alternative which lets you be extremely specific in what you want filtered out.

Some examples of the kind of filters you could set would for example be:

  • No political threads. Applies only to threads but not comments. Filters out memes aswell based on the content of the media.
  • No political content whatsoever. Hides also political comments from non-political threads.
  • No right/left wing politics. Self explainatory.
  • No right/left wing politics with the exception of good-faith arguments. Filters out trolls and provocateurs but still exposes you to good-faith arguments from the other side.
  • No mean, hateful or snide comments. Self explainatory.
  • No karma fishing comments. Filters out comments with no real content.
  • No content from users that have said/done (something) in the past. Analyzes their post history and acts accordingly. For example hides posts from people that have said mean things in the past.

Now obviously with a tool like this you could build yourself the perfect echo chamber where you're never exposed to new ideas which probably is not optimal but it's also not obvious to me why this would be a bad thing if it's something you want. There's way too much content for you to pay attention to all of it anyway so why not just optimize your feed to only have stuff you're interested in? With a tool like this you could quite easily take a platform that's an absolute dumpster fire like Twitter or Reddit and just clean it up and all of a sudden it's useable again. This could possibly also discourage certain type of behaviour online because it means that trolls for example could no longer reach the people they want to troll.

 

And I don't mean things you previously had no strong opinion about.

What is a belief you used to hold that you no longer do, and what/who made you change your mind about it?

 

For context: The thread was about why people hate Hexbear and Lemmygrad instances

 

For me it's detailed describtions about people's dreams.

Not only doesn't your story make any sense, but you're also telling me about something that didn't even happen. It's kind of like telling about an event, and then ending the story by saying you just made it all up, except with dreams you begin by telling it's all made up. I'm already not interested before you even started.

view more: next ›