Pyr_Pressure

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Personally I prefer a mixture of both. Touch screen for anything you don't need to operate while driving and physical for everything else.

Android Auto navigation, car system/audio settings, clock and system management, etc should all be a touch screen so you aren't navigating through turning knobs and pressing up and down buttons to go through various menus like your programming a microwave.

Knobs and dials and buttons for anything to do with audio volume, skip/reverse tracks, etc. and air conditioning.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Is it only through the skin? I could see it being useful for some sort of implanted medical device/monitoring system.

That way you have something subcutaneous but the power source is strapped to the outside of your body so you can remove for short periods of time to wash/recharge it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Why not both?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, can you really say that something doesn't have a colour if you see it as that colour? Does it really matter that the colour is coming from different refractive indexes rather than that wavelength not being absorbed by the material? If it consistently happens in that set of circumstances, isn't it fair to say that is its colour? I.e. the coating, oil slicks

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

You mean waking up in the dark to a loud alarm clock to waking up in the morning to sunshine and fresh air?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I had a phone with one on the back and currently have one with it on the screen. Personally I had absolutely no issues with its functionality in the screen and do prefer it over the back. I like that I can unlock my phone without having to pick it up off the desk or while its still in the mount on my vehicle dash.

Seems to work perfectly fine to me but maybe it's a quality issues with the brand of phones. Mine is a OnePlus and it's almost 4 years old now, still works fine and never had any issues.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yes I know, but I was just trying to put into the perspective the person I was replying to.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Except the lifetime of the universe is quite small when compared to infinity, so it doesn't really convey how large infinity is because it's so much more.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I mean, it doesn't really matter if you don't think toddlers need realistic depictions, if it's running that means that toddlers are watching it or the parents of toddlers want realistic depictions.

What should they be watching? Superheroes? Other toddlers that behave like perfect angels? I'm sure there are enough other options out there, if they were watching those all the time then the realistic depictions wouldn't be on air still. I remember watching Caillou and that was like 25 years ago, so obviously it's probably doing something right.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That seems... Inefficient?

New Social media pops up every other year or so. Do they need to meet and vote to add new ones to the list every time?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

I used chat gpt, mostly because I absolutely hate how widespread and pushy every company has been about using AI and throwing it in my face so I stubbornly refuse to use any of it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Sometimes it's helpful if I'm having trouble making a specific excel formula

 

What companies will you never give another dollar to?

What happened that put them on your blacklist?

view more: next ›