this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
128 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
3586 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Cruise recalls all self-driving cars after grisly accident and California ban | All 950 of the General Motors subsidiary’s autonomous cars will be taken off roads for a software update::All 950 of the General Motors subsidiary’s autonomous cars will be taken off roads for a software update

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (8 children)

It is more than zero. Anything that beats humans is a win. Getting to zero is unrealistic. Nothing has a zero risk of death.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Correct, that's exactly what I'm saying. Zero is the acceptable number, so anything that gets us closer to that is good.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

You're shifting goal posts.

What's the acceptable vehicular homicide rate? GM seems to think it's more than zero.

Correct, that's exactly what I'm saying. Zero is the ideal number, so anything that gets us closer to that is good.

Acceptable is different than ideal.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok ya pedantic fuck. I edited my comment just for you. I know English is hard to understand.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

But now you're misusing "acceptable".

We would need to get to the other side of acceptable for widespread use of autos (self driving vehicles). It's not an unachievable goal you always try to get closer to. That word is your previously used "ideal". Which its seems now is what you meant with your original comment, instead of the "acceptable" you actually used.

It's not just pedantic. I'm not the only one who thought you said something you apparently now didn't mean, because you used words you apparently don't understand. The words you use are vital to your being understood.

You could just humbly admit your original mistake in language, and nobody would give you a hard time.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm misusing "acceptable" because you think I mean something that I didn't mean? Move along then.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes! Exactly! And based on the vote counts I'm seeing 2/3 people misunderstood you. And when one is trying to explain something to another, if the other doesn't understand, it can logically only be the fault of the person explaining.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)