Spendrill

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Olbas oil, probably.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Brandy is your friend. Well, for one night it's your friend and the next day you'll feel awful but at least you'll have the satisfaction of knowing it was self inflicted rather than some poxy self-replicator making you feel bad.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

I'm enjoying the title more than the meme tbh.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 11 months ago

and they weren’t besieged during WWII.

Cheese eating surrender monkeys. Created a state of the art defence system but didn't extend it across the gap where 'the Germans will never invade through such rough terrain' although they did before during WWI.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Listen, just go and read the thing; it will be time better spent than listening to me precis it from memory. but if you do read it a feel like it hasn't given you an insight into what drives a whole host of behaviour that one sees on social media or that I've misunderstood the book then do come back to me and I will refresh my memory of the book to have that discussion with you.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

We need a normie.world

It's called reddit and that's why I left. Fuck the normies. They'll import fascism.

That sounds unnecessarily combative so let me expand my argument.

There's a book called The Authoritarians by a man called Bob Altermyer. Altermyer is now retired but he was a professor of psychology at the University of Manitoba. During his career he did a lot of research into authoritarians, both followers and leaders. In the book he describes for laypeople the experiments and the findings. If you want to do a deep dive into his statistical analysis you can because the whole thing is fully referenced but for people who just want an easy to read description that is also easy to understand then this is the book for you.

After reading the book redditors behaviour became a lot more easy to understand. I was less upset by what was going on but I stopped engaging because I now understood that reddit wasn't a site for me anymore. It was a site for people that enjoyed being normal and doing normal things. And that's ok, why shouldn't they be catered for?

I use reddit and lemmy exclusively on desktop or laptop. So when the app business came up I didn't regard it as my fight, however I thought that if I expected people to stand up for my interests if they are challenged I should show a bit of solidarity with them. So I didn't visit reddit at all for the days it was blacked out. I didn't like how spez reacted. I saw that people were crossing to the fediverse and I took a look for myself. I liked it. I posted. I wasn't attacked for having a non-normie viewpoint. I liked that a lot.

The thing about normies is they don't read scientific studies for fun, they don't like long winded explanations about why the world is the way it is. They think they can see something in the street and extrapolate an entire social policy from it and there are chancers that will tell them, 'You know what? You're right. We don't need experts telling you that you're wrong, what do they know?'

So your Jordan Petersons and your Nigel Farages and Alex whatever his nameis, these people and reddit's normie audience are made for each other. I'll even go as far as to say this extends to the people that think the Democrats or the Labour Party are going to fix their problems, Team Liberal aren't doing themselves any favours but my point is that if your goal is a massive website that caters to the largest part of the reddit audience you're going to end up swimming in cryptofascist and sometimes outright fascist content. Been there, seen that, got the t-shirt.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I couldn't give a monkey's.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Barking up the wrong tree, I'm a Londoner.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Was there ever proof that the Republicans donated to Nader in the 2000 election? Seems they did just about everything they could to deny the popular vote...

[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 year ago (10 children)

This isn't about kids and it isn't about abortion it's about limiting people's access to unmediated information. The Democrats have just as much to lose as the Republicans if a third party which is a lesser evil than either emerges. Or, seeing as this is America we're talking about, greater evil.

Whatever. They don't want people being able to just organise themselves as they please online.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Fucking Francis Dolarhyde creeping around again.

'And your data belongs exclusively to me in perpetuity. Do you see?'

view more: ‹ prev next ›