SleafordMod

joined 7 months ago
 

As we roll out more generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done

we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce

Are we done for?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

It would be great to live in a world without nukes. But as it stands, quite a few countries have nukes. If the UK gave up its nukes then Russia or China could come along and take over the UK. "Surrender or we'll nuke you."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Why are you so upset about my posts?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I dunno what that means. Anyway what's the point of your insults? I mean I could call you a fucking idiot but is that actually productive? Maybe every time I see a post from Hexbear I should just reply "you're a moron"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I think the UK is a democracy but it's a bit flawed (like every democracy I guess). I often think the UK would be more democratic if we had proportional representation.

Anyway the subject is just being changed, this is a tangent. My original point was that nukes could help the UK to defend itself. Perhaps Europe as a whole can have a shared nuclear capability, starting with British/French nukes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

they’re all gonna need to either be put in prison until they can be taught to value human life, or else be killed

Cleaners and bus drivers who work in the City of London? Even if you just mean bankers, are they as bad as rapists and murderers? I don't love bankers but I don't think that working for a bank means you need to be imprisoned or killed.

I hope you have the same level of outrage about the real civilians in Gaza that the RAF has provided over 50% of the reconnaissance overflights for

Well I think Israel should stop its bombings of Gaza. You're changing the subject though. It's completely possible for me to disagree with Israel's actions in Gaza, while also disagreeing with the idea of nuking the City of London.

 

This article notes that "right-wing governments, including the US and Hungary, are increasingly blaming falling fertility rates on a rejection of parenthood", as if today's young adults just don't want children.

But the author suggests that actually people do want children, and one of the main reasons they're having fewer children is because they can't afford many children.

Thoughts?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I can't see this reply because it was removed by a mod.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I can't see your post because it was removed by a mod.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yes they're civilians. Not just bankers (although I don't think bankers deserve death just because someone on the internet doesn't like them). There will be cleaners, bus drivers, shop workers, etc, and you want to murder them all with a nuclear bomb.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (6 children)

That link isn't working for me. But in any case I can't really change what the UK government does. I can vote but that doesn't really make a huge difference.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Yeah, you're definitely on the moral side of the argument when you fantasise about murdering civilians with a nuclear bomb.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (23 children)

Why do tankies always leap to the defence of Russia and China? Really odd.

 

There is also another article in The Guardian about an open letter by nearly 400 British and Irish writers, calling Israel's war on Gaza "genocide". This seems to be a separate letter from the one reported by the BBC above.

Another thing I read this morning was this BBC story about a woman in Gaza who suffered a miscarriage due to the tribulations of trying to survive during Israel's military action. She and her husband also had IVF embryos at a fertility clinic in Gaza, but those have been destroyed by Israeli bombing, so this couple believe they may never have a chance to have children now.

Thoughts?

 

George Monbiot suggests that Labour shouldn't be supported because they're now pushing right-wing policies, in his view.

So he thinks people should tactically support progressive parties who support electoral reform (Lib Dems, Greens, SNP, Plaid Cymru), which may hopefully then lead to electoral reform, so that we end up with proportional representation. Then Brits will have more choices than effectively just two parties for future elections.

Thoughts?

 

Do you think AI is, or could become, conscious?

I think AI might one day emulate consciousness to a high level of accuracy, but that wouldn't mean it would actually be conscious.

This article mentions a Google engineer who "argued that AI chatbots could feel things and potentially suffer". But surely in order to "feel things" you would need a nervous system right? When you feel pain from touching something very hot, it's your nerves that are sending those pain signals to your brain... right?

 

Do you agree that Brexit has been "a pointless waste of time, money and effort"?

 

It seems the left dislike Starmer because he's tacking to the right, and the right dislike Starmer because he's not Farage.

Thoughts?

 

The Register mostly covers tech news but I noticed this story about defence spending.

Apparently the UK is now spending more of its defence budget with European arms makers. Do you think this is a good thing?

 

Justine Greening, the former Tory MP, argues that the current Tory strategy of going after Reform voters isn't working. She seems to think the Tories should try to capture centrists instead (which is what David Cameron did, I would argue).

The party has attempted to be a “mini-me” version of Reform UK, and unsurprisingly Reform voters prefer the real thing. And this strategy’s consequential alienation of Conservative-leaning centre-ground voters has seen them head off to either the Lib Dems or Labour, or to the Green party. The party has no winning majority in any age group of voters other than those over 70. This is no basis for a successful electoral strategy for the longer term.

 

This is a long article (excerpts from a book apparently) but it's interesting.

Basically the author, a man with Jewish heritage, makes a fake persona and joins far-right groups. He's assisted by the group Hope Not Hate.

What do you think of the far-right? One of the interesting points that is made in the article a few times is that some far-right adherents, met by the author, seem to want friendship more than anything else. At least that's the author's view.

 

This opinion article argues that Labour should support green policies for moral reasons, but the author also argues that Farage's anti-green message is not what the public want. Apparently "68% of Farage’s constituents in Clacton-on-Sea, Essex, declared themselves 'somewhat' or 'very' worried" about climate change.

The article links to this Bluesky thread from a pollster which is interesting:

A screenshot of a Bluesky thread which is linked above

Edit: you can right click the above image and open it in a new tab to see it full size.

 

I found this interesting. It's mainly about how Brexit has introduced extra red tape when dealing with Europe. The article says how the EU is the UK's largest trading partner, with the value of trade being over double that of the next largest trading partner: the USA.

Here are some quotes:

The days of freedom of movement for people, goods, and services between the UK and its neighbours are long gone.

The British economy has lost out and British citizens and businesses suffer from greater bureaucratic botheration.

Nor has immigration into the UK gone down since leaving the EU. The numbers have actually gone up, with people from Commonwealth countries, including India, Pakistan and Nigeria, more than compensating for EU citizens who used to come and go.

view more: next ›