Have exactly the same setup:
It tunnels everything that is bound to the same network (see the line with gluetun within the qbittorrent container.
And for anyone using a reverse proxy: that can run against the gluetun container with the bound containers port. (edit: in OPs example gluetun:8090 for qbittorrent web)
Why a limit at all? I see it as our role to share just as we received it from others who shared with us.
If space is needed remove the ones with the lost existing seeders instead of some ratio goal.
Keep each torrent alive!
I get what you're saying - from the article and your comment I couldn't name the group of people that it discrimates against though.
Perhaps that's a different legal blah blah but where I'm from you can only discrimate against a protected group of people (race, religion, disability, gender are the ones I am aware of).
Discrimination would be a tough sell - and a "you're creating a divide" would likely be met with a "well discuss that with your supervisor, this is a decision based on individual and team circumstances" - which leads then to the issues described in the OP.
I would be delighted if someone could bring more efficient HR confronting arguments!
Oh that would make sense!
Wait why are complaining about the stupid devices of others instead of your one that doesn't allow you to manage its connections?
I would be furious at my stuff doing stupid shit not that of others.
"Being a router" is what they are good for! Even needed.
Edit to be more specific: two switches in each of the 10gbit and redundant uplink would be a setup I can see, depending on your line.
No overkill there :)