Scipitie

Yes

At least in Germany it's the same. It gets ignored in the discussions concerning nuclear exit but it's actually the main reason why I'm not aggressively against it: we have save areas for nuclear storage but those fight bitterly to not have it. The areas which are currently used are... Not good. Paying someone else (such as Finland) is out of budget for both state and energy companies. The latter anyway want to do the running but not the maintenance and the building, state should pay for that.

It's really white sad for me. The (true) statement that the dangerous waste needs to be stored carefully got corrupted to "it can't be stored".

Oh sorry, nvidia RTX :) Thanks!

Lowest price on Ebay for me is 290 Euro :/ The p100 are 200 each though.

Do you happen to know if I could mix a 3700 with a p100?

And thanks for the tips!

And still there are other people than you who want to do that full-time - and in doing so provide, at least for me, more value than the 6ooth marvel billion dollar movie.

There are educators and entertainers out there who chose this as a job and are good at it. If they could live off of it by going the patreon route instead of the shitty YouTube ad spam one I'd be all for it.

That's still like a hundred to one or even way worse. We can simply shove in (group reader doesn't like) until they are so full that they can't move any more and then pile on each individually and still have a few billion people preparing the lion BBQ for afterwards.

The numbers gap is ridiculously huge!

Which of those questions from the article would you describe as loaded enough to imply the quite interesting responses?

I expected to read something like "why are Chinese people stupid?" and then some racist shit - but the answers to those questions are.. Interesting.

The bankruptcy scenario is correct but the first part isn't: you don't have X shares as collateral that you can liquidate. Instead, you have collateral to cover sum Y.

As long as the collateral contract covers enough stock positions the bank won't lose.

That said all of this is assuming standard contracts. If y bank wrote "0% interest and instead 50% of the revenue growth of Twitter" then this would be an easy way to lose money.

Haven't heard of a stupid banker yet, though, so what would the chances be?

According to their page it's a pure searxng instance. I didn't see anything on my own instance changing so there are three options I see:

• The mentioned server side changes (e.g. A server move you mentioned but could also be server settings, provider settings, etc).
• client side changes: somehow your Firefox provides different information to alter the results
• subjective change: it's always a possibility that either what you searched or your perception was more fine tuned to Cyrillic.

And then there's the obligatory "none or all of the above".

Personally I'd guess it's just a fluke. I gave it a few searches from Firefox mobile on "all languages" and had a mix of mainly English and a bit of German und French in there as results.

Edit: if you're comfortable with that feel free to share some search terms and we can compare results. Would be curious myself!

I strongly disagree. The burden of proof lies with the one making the claim and this bot has zero transparency regarding its benchmark, database or other criteria. That combined with the fact that it's usage (apparently exclusively) seems to be highly pushed is enough to stay sceptical.

Personally I just blocked it but I have full understanding for anyone downvoting it, simply to communicate "I disagree with the existence of this bot in this context"

Both langchain as well as ollama run locally and are open source.

To be very frank: your post sounds like fear mongering without having even clicked on the link.

You use the word "secret" quite generously but otherwise: yes. They deal in endorphines,playing the long game.