this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
157 points (83.1% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
3250 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
157
Research: The Growing Inequality of Who Gets to Work from Home (hbr.org)
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Research: The Growing Inequality of Who Gets to Work from Home::There is a large and growing divide in terms of who gets to work from home. Research on job postings found that remote work is far more common for higher paid roles, for roles that require more experience, for full-time work, and for roles that require more education. Managers should be aware of this divide, as it has the potential to create toxic dynamics within teams and to sap morale.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I get what you're saying - from the article and your comment I couldn't name the group of people that it discrimates against though.

Perhaps that's a different legal blah blah but where I'm from you can only discrimate against a protected group of people (race, religion, disability, gender are the ones I am aware of).

Discrimination would be a tough sell - and a "you're creating a divide" would likely be met with a "well discuss that with your supervisor, this is a decision based on individual and team circumstances" - which leads then to the issues described in the OP.

I would be delighted if someone could bring more efficient HR confronting arguments!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I couldn’t name the group of people that it discrimates (sic) against though.

My best guess is people with disabilities, but I couldn't really speculate on specifics.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

ADHD, anything alleviated by advanced ergonomics that aren't provided in the office, compromised immune systems... some might be a stretch though

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I would be delighted if someone could bring more efficient HR confronting arguments!

How about the well-rested bonus you can bring to the workplace because you don't have to commute. It's one of the rare cases where it's actually a good idea to argue with employee efficiency as giving them even 10% of the overall gains benefits them and they might even think you're a brainless worker drone really doing it for the company.