The only issue with that is, it takes a ton of resources to make, yeah?
PeleSpirit
In the US, you would be called a liberal.
I will never understand that version of what you're talking about. They should just buy out some land and build their own town, but watch out for bears.
Thanks for explaining, I think I understand how I feel about things better now too.
It's kind of like when the UK says fanny, they mean vagina and the US means butt. It does and will cause misinformation to thrive. Just because we have 2 different meanings, that doesn't mean either is wrong.
That's not what I mean, I know you will get it. But US politics has a lot of misinformation going on, mixing up terms the US uses for certain things can make the misinformation thrive. In US terms, you sound like a liberal. You don't want a nanny state, you want a government owned by the people.
So you're not in the US? Confusing the terms makes it harder for the US, but probably easier for others ig.
but DOES believe in rules and various degrees of enforcement to defend the powerless from the powerful.
So, kind of a soft government? What about roads and utilities? What really turns me off of libertarian is the belief that people have to pay for their own roads and fireman. The rich will only survive then, kind of like how our healthcare is right now. But if you're saying that the government is ran more like a co-op, then I get it.
I have never heard of a Left-libertarian, what are your libertarian views?
That's why I'm already on different instances, it's not hard at all to switch and compare.
Is it? We've been making glass for centuries and it's the one thing that is consistently recycled. You would have to grow the wood (resources), transport the wood (resources), change the wood's properties (resources) and there is no recycling in place.