yes, they are not nearly on Googles level, not even comparably.
Secondly it's not even primarily about that, even if it made no difference, two competing shitty companies is better than a full on monopoly.
I'm not coming from google hate, I just want there to be more than one actor, therefore I will never ever pick the largest one.
Every single time someone mentions they abandoned firefox for something "better", it's chromium based. Privacy is good, but the most important for me is to avoid monopoly/monoculture.
It is built on the QtWebEngine, which is a wrapper for the Chromium browser core.
-Wikipedia
It is built on the QtWebEngine, which is a wrapper for the Chromium browser core.
yeah, thats chromium bro
well it kind of is, for large companies
probably still the budget, but not as in amount, but as in how it is specified in the actual budget.
at least its not a single use product, the packaging it comes in is probably a worse contributor
that's...
I somehow doubt that.
True enough. Though I wonder, as a thought experiment, what would be the actual better option in the long run. Some type of resin maybe?
doesn't metal manufacturing use quite a lot more energy?
If they control the browser core they control the web, no two ways about it.