this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
586 points (94.3% liked)

Memes

45581 readers
1886 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Jokes on you. I'm a Machinist and that feature on the drawing has an perpendicularity GD&T callout of +- 1deg. In spec is in spec. Ship it!!!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

I like this positive attitude!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, no- it's the design engineer who is clearly wrong.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Nah I blame the mathematicians

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

As long as it's perfectly 89° it's fine. That's acute angle.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

It's very well drawn too, no overshooting on the edges. Looks good to me.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Barely acute 😳

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Engineers: Eh, close enough.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

shrugs Same order of magnitude

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't know 1° difference would be this noticeable. I am very disturbed.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

It's noticable cos its 87 degrees not 89.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago

No. It's wrong, too. Have a nice day :)

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

I saw this before and if I remember correctly, it's more like 87°.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. It measures about 87°.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wtf?! The fact that OP got it wrong is even more disturbing!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Wrong on purpose

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

OP didn't make this

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

Guys it’s actually 90° but the photo is taken on an angle.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

90° isn't any more perfect than 89°. Unless it was supposed to be 90°.

So if you post this exact thing but include the right angle indicator, that would make the image work as intended.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's supposed to be 89° but is actually 87°. So it qualifies as imperfect.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Love it (after I confirmed it to be true via the rotate function in the photo editor)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

More concerned about why you wasted all those colors on this image when two was sufficient?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I’ll see you in hell

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Grabbing my phone protractor now.....brb

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

You should have put the little square thing in the corner to indicate a right angle!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

It's still perfect since you can just take 32040 of these (= 89*360, ggt is 1 since 89 is prime) and then you will have a full circle. A real shame it would have been when you would have took an irrational amount of degrees since then this calculation would not be possible. There could only be an approximation that makes it impossible in reality to decide if it is right or not but mathematically speaken it would be impossible.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I can't believe you've done this

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Anybody who posts images like this have a special position in hell

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

That's not right.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I prefer the 91° version

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

After reading the title I internally thought: "fuck!"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You evil son of a witch.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Not a whole circle? BASTARD!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Don't let perfect be the enemy of good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You monster.