this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
15 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4959 readers
332 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

In the future, I may be unable to shower and the nation's crops may be dying of drought but thank god we will be able to use our Yankee chatbots as the good lord intended

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

But it’s not like all the water just disappears after it enters the data centres. Surely what happens to it when it leaves is key. Can’t it be treated and returned?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

But it’s not like all the water just disappears after it enters the data centres.

It doesn't disappear as such, but it won't be in usable form.

The reason they want to make use of the water isn't as a heat transfer fluid to something else (well, they might use some water for that too, but that's not what's driving the consumption). They're evaporating it. The phase change from liquid water to water vapor consumes energy.

Evaporative coolers work on this principle.

So now you've got a bunch of water vapor blowing away in the wind, which you're not going to be drinking. It's not gone, as it'll turn into rain or some other form of precipitation somewhere else, but that'll be somewhere else.

Same thing some thermal power plants do


you probably have seen images of those nuclear power plants with cooling towers, and other types of thermal power plants will do the same, coal, oil, gas.

That being said, they don't really need freshwater, as long as they can set up some sort of evaporation system that uses seawater for cooling, doesn't clog up from salt or other stuff building up. More of a hassle to deal with than freshwater, but it still evaporates. The UK being an archipelago, seawater is not in terribly short supply.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for the explanation.

So this is effectively like half of a fridges coolant system, but they’re missing the bit where they condense the coolant back and reuse it?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

I don't know if the coolant in fridges undergoes phase change between gas or liquid or just pressure change and stays a gas, but if it does a phase change, sure.

kagis

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_pump

A gaseous refrigerant is compressed so its pressure and temperature rise. When operating as a heater in cold weather, the warmed gas flows to a heat exchanger in the indoor space where some of its thermal energy is transferred to that indoor space, causing the gas to condense into a liquid. The liquified refrigerant flows to a heat exchanger in the outdoor space where the pressure falls, the liquid evaporates and the temperature of the gas falls.

Yeah, sounds like it does do a phase change.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

They can't even treat water with literal shit in it before dumping it back into rivers and the sea. Why would they be able to do any better with data centres.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Well it doesn’t have literal shit in it for starters.

If you have a water cooled pc, one end of it isn’t connected to the mains and the other end to the drain. It’s a loop. I can’t see why the same can’t be made true of data centres.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Money is why, you expect amazon to pay extra money to setup a closed loop system when they could offset the costs to the water company?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I don’t expect them too, I expect them to be made too. No data centres should be allowed to treat water as an infinite resource.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

I see you're labouring under the illusion that the UK government aren't desperate for AI cash

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

What’s fucking ridiculous, is that any industry could not have to report water usages. Let alone an environmental disaster area like AI.