this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
755 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

70996 readers
3819 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

YouTube pulled a popular tutorial video from tech creator Jeff Geerling this week, claiming his guide to installing LibreELEC on a Raspberry Pi 5 violated policies against "harmful content." The video, which showed viewers how to set up their own home media servers, had been live for over a year and racked up more than 500,000 views. YouTube's automated systems flagged the content for allegedly teaching people "how to get unauthorized or free access to audio or audiovisual content."

Geerling says his tutorial covered only legal self-hosting of media people already own -- no piracy tools or copyright workarounds. He said he goes out of his way to avoid mentioning popular piracy software in his videos. It's the second time YouTube has pulled a self-hosting content video from Geerling. Last October, YouTube removed his Jellyfin tutorial, though that decision was quickly reversed after appeal. This time, his appeal was denied.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 29 points 14 hours ago

Notably, Youtube does not consider exploiting children for profit harmful.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe stop relying on fucking youtube?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

Gotta preach where the choir is.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 hours ago

Are you suggesting that a guide on how to leave youtube should be elsewhere?

Thats like requiring to pass an exam to get access to the textbook.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

JG can also be found on Floatplane.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

I'm a fan of PeerTube, but it's.. rough. Discoverability is subpar and many instances are bandwidth constrained. Video streaming is still a bulk-hosting game unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

you say in the video that you use this setup to watch YouTube. I love watching YouTube with Kodi as it shows no ads. I guess they don't love that.

I'm not saying that justifies the strike, but it might be connected

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 hours ago

The problem is that LibreELEC is piracy-adjacent. So you get these bogus take-downs because different people draw the line differently, and fighting a legal battle is 1000x as expensive as the outcome is worth to most people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago

Didn't they recently greenlight adblocker advertising?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

The video is up again:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hFas54xFtg

But at some point, he shows he's moving some files to LibreELEC, and he has a folder called "Chernobyl" - how can that possibly be legal, if the folder actually contains files with the HBO show of the same name? Just asking because I'm curious 😊

[–] [email protected] 20 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_(miniseries)

It was released on DVD and Blu-ray, if he purchased the disc and ripped it to his media, and hasn't shared those files with anyone, then it is legal, as an exception to copyright in the US, where Jeff and Google are both based.

Jeff has stated on multiple occasions that he purchases and rips his media, and does not use piracy.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Also like… you can legally just name your file wtf ever you want, I can make a folder full of pics of my dogs and name it “Chernobyl” it’s not illegal to use a word to name a file

[–] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago

Ah - didn't know it had been released on physical media.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 19 hours ago

You don't know the exact content of the files. He did not show those vidoeclips. I dont know if you can buy that or not. Sure it can be indication but in general you dont know as it varies between video to video if it is possible to buy.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

“how to get unauthorized or free access to audio or audiovisual content.”

In the future, public domain media will be banned for harming corporate profits.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

In the 1970s/80s, the corporations just taxed blank media - because it was obviously used to pirate their warez.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty sure you also had to pay royalties fees for radio/Internet radio regardless of where or not you played their music.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

And still do for live performance by cover bands.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 day ago

They are so pissed that we dare own anything. Fuck corpos.

[–] [email protected] 138 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This kind of crap is driving popular creators, like Geerling, to move to other places. YT / Alphabet has lost the plot.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago

I tried a couple of other platforms but I keep running into a moderation issue where the other platforms market to the sort of people who would be permanently banned from YouTube.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yep. Most of my favorite creators are on Nebula now.

The ones that aren't get watched on SmartTube or in Brave Browser.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

Nebula

Closed source, centralized and not even free...

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Hypocritical Lemmy.... Preaching (F) OSS and then using Brave.... LoL!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I love Nebula. I go there to watch Nebula Exclusives but it's not great for browsing or discovering new channels...I found everyone I subscribe to on YouTube first

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I managed to find Extra History via Nebula, and it's one of my new favorite channels...but I've found a lot more favorites from YouTube, definitely.

One thing I do love is finding a new channel I like that has years of backlog.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago

Google should have been broken up years ago.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

People are quick to burn Youtube here when its clearly the american copyright reach that causes this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

Youtube (under Google)'s implementation of US copyright considerations is a huge problem above and beyond the abomination that is the copyright law itself.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 22 hours ago

YouTube took down the video because of its own policies, not because of copyright law. So we should be blaming YouTube.

I think it's easy to see exactly why if you consider how YouTube treats small content creators. If I post a video and companies claim copyright on it, the video gets demonetized and I might lose my account. I can respond and contest the claim and maybe I can win but I still lost money in the meantime, and perhaps more significantly, the companies that made their copyright claims will never face a consequence for attempting to burn my channel. In other words, if I get things wrong a few times I'll lose my channel and my income source, but if they get things wrong a million times, they face zero consequence.

And you might be inclined to blame the media companies. But again, this is YouTube doing what YouTube wants to do of its own volition, and not something that's required by law. If YouTube valued small-scale content creators and end users, it would create different policies.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago

I think it's both, a dumb system enforced in a somehow dumber way

[–] [email protected] 96 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Sue YouTube. They won't change meaningfully until forced to.

[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 day ago (14 children)

Sue for defamation that Youtube are alleging he is promoting criminal activity of piracy.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Like google, I'm sure Jeff has a near unlimited supply of money to pay lawyers.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because self hosting is getting cheaper and easier while average internet upload speeds are crazy high for the home user. Of course Google is scared.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Cries in single digit upload speeds

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Single digit??? Let me guess spectrum?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

Just use another unit. It's an easy fix.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Perhaps this can a driver of sorts for Peertube.

It's a good thing that I can't stand video tutorials or reviews (with the exception of video games).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›