this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
82 points (89.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

32261 readers
1803 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 days ago

"Us vs them" mentality.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago

Religion, because they all believe that they are the only ones who are right, and everyone else needs to believe what they believe, or else something bad will come of it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Good old fashioned tribalism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Every other answer on this thread boils down to tribalism.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 days ago

American Exceptionalism.

gestures broadly

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Well, Islam is definitely up there - and you only need to look at the Middle East for evidence. What makes it particularly dangerous, in my view, is the doctrine itself - especially the parts concerning treatment of women, martyrdom and hatred of infidels.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

As someone who escaped Islam - 100%. Unlike other religions that take original texts as interpretations Islam takes the original texts as literal words of God and is essentially stuck. It's a dead religion that exists only through force.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Yeah, my understanding is that the interpretation of the Qur’an and Hadiths doesn’t allow for the same kind of flexibility or reform that the Bible does, for example. Of course, that doesn’t mean someone can’t practice a non-fundamentalist version of Islam - and many do - but it’s much harder to justify when you're going against what’s considered the literal word of God.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Any and every form of dehumanization.

Any and every form of bigotry.

Any and every form of supremacy.

Any and every form of authoritarianism.

Every single person from the homeless guy at the on-ramp to TACO himself is an ordinary human. Some humans are born into extraordinary circumstances, some humans accomplish extraordinary feats, but we are all human. Humans are not born hating other humans. Hate is taught and encouraged and ingrained so that it may be passed on.

Universal Basic Income is a bandaid on a system couched in one of the ugliest human motivations; greed. I chose my name for that reason; Universal Basic Justice. Justice must be the base motivation; not 'eye for an eye' or 'frontier justice,' but the belief in treating others as you want to be treated; the belief in the powers of forgiveness, responsibility and growth; and the power of compassionate care dedicated to help those that are willing to learn and grow.

If and only if all those fail should a human be separated from society in a humane way that prevents their flaws from harming others.

Death Row is not justice. Guillotines are not justice. Systemic violence is not justice. No government nor individual should be empowered to decide who is worthy of justice, of forgiveness, of growth. Of life.

Every human is fallible. Every human deserves the opportunity to recognize their mistakes as well as the opportunity to learn, grow, and make reparations for those mistakes.

I don't see these changes happening in my lifetime. At this point, I'm not sure we humans have enough lifetimes left to achieve these goals.

What I am sure of is the danger and violence incumbent within any ideology willing to look down at another human being.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Individualism.

It has led to a massive amount of duplication of human effort. We could all live massively improved lives if we acted as a community organization instead of a bunch of individual little fuckers whose opinions matter.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You should see what happens when you try force the people of an natural individualistic bend into community organization. Undermining, diversion and later, violence.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Right. Underscoring that individualism is a highly sinister force.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

No, forcing compliance is the sinister part, resisting it is natural. People that talk like you is why people who disagree see little difference between fascism and socialism, one just has better health care access.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

Ableism. As disability advocate Imani Barbarin says, if bigotry is the goal, ableism and eugenics are the toolkit. If you look at the history of any form of systemic bigotry, the justification for human atrocities almost always boils down to “well these people can’t contribute to society, so they don’t deserve to be a part of it.”

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

Not an ideology but I say extremisms, of all kind. Not only religious and political, those are obvious, but also day to day habits.

[–] [email protected] 119 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Isaac Asimov famously said, “There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'”.

The idea that any idea is worth listening to because someone believes in it.

Show me the proof.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I see four downvotes.

Would love to know the position those people have. Are they threatened by their own ignorance being called out? Or are they just conservative?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'd like to think that they are just mad that they have to see this quote so often these days.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

I find this so confusing… it’s like the old saying, “if you don’t want to be called a fascist, don’t be a fascist!”

Conservatives have the strangest contradictions. They want to be all these socially and morally odious things, then get upset when we call them out on those very things.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I think any idea is worth listening to, it's the assertion that we must inherently accept their viewpoint as valid that is outright absurd.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

On the playground sure, but at some level it's show the receipts first or get fucked up to discourage gish gallop. If we don't preemptively shut it down, we're in extreme danger.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

I felt this way until recently, when I'm becoming much more aware of how limited our collective attention is. Every honest belief probably deserves to have one (maybe 3) reasonable people listen to it. But they definitely aren't all worth national/state/city/expert attention.

[–] [email protected] 118 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Neoliberalism. The belief that owners of corporations should be able to do whatever the fuck they want, because corporations always create the best outcome possible for society.

The result is stuff like the US Opioid Crisis. Purdue Pharma knew that opioid pharmaceuticals were extremely addictive. For decades, they lied and said it was not addictive. In private, they laughed about their victims.

They bribed doctors and dentists to overprescribe it:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/29/health/purdue-opioids-oxycontin.html

https://www.latimes.com/projects/oxycontin-part1/

They also paid think-tanks to defend them and aggressively challenged negative media coverage:

https://www.propublica.org/article/inside-purdue-pharma-media-playbook-how-it-planted-the-opioid-anti-story

The tobacco companies used the same techniques before western governments cracked down on them.

In the 90s, they tried to prevent governments from acting by bribing politicians:

An NPR review of McConnell's relationship with the tobacco industry over the decades has found that McConnell repeatedly cast doubt on the health consequences of smoking, repeated industry talking points word-for-word, attacked federal regulators at the industry's request and opposed bipartisan tobacco regulations going back decades.

Soon after McConnell won a U.S. Senate seat, he was invited to the Tobacco Institute's boardroom to give a speech in January 1985. The documents also reveal that McConnell and his Senate office frequently accepted gifts from tobacco industry lobbyists

The gifts included tickets to NFL and NBA games, a production of Dostoevsky's Crime And Punishment, a Ringo Starr concert, "top-quality brandy," and what McConnell called a "beautiful ham."

When McConnell has sought re-election, tobacco company employees and PACs have typically donated to McConnell more than to any other member of Congress, according to data from the Center For Responsive Politics. Since 1989, he has received at least $650,000

One of the most striking episodes revealed in the tobacco industry documents came in October 1998. Just a few months earlier, McConnell helped defeat major tobacco legislation championed by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.

The McCain bill would have ratified and strengthened the proposed settlement between the tobacco industry and attorneys general from most of the states. It would have also allowed FDA regulation of nicotine and penalized companies that failed to reduce teen smoking.

McConnell, who had repeatedly clashed with McCain over campaign finance legislation, helped lead the opposition. "We know, of course, that only 2% of smokers are teenagers," McConnell said.

(In fact, nearly 90% of all smokers begin before they turn 18 years old.)

"That to me is the most egregious incident that I have seen about the appearance of corruption since I have been a member of the United States Senate," McCain later said of McConnell

https://www.npr.org/2019/06/17/730496066/tobaccos-special-friend-what-internal-documents-say-about-mitch-mcconnell

In many countries, tobacco corporations are still using mafia methods:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/12/big-tobacco-dirty-war-africa-market

For neoliberals, the corporations should decide what is acceptable or not. If there is a profitable market for something, then it means it should be legal. Period. They don't give a shit about selling addictive poison to kids, destroying the environment or underpaying workers. Corporate profits are their religion.

Neoliberals believe citizens or lawmakers should never try to fix injustice, because corporations can't create injustice. And if they want to be involved and threaten corporate profits, you have to punch them in the nose.

In 1951, Jacobo Árbenz was democratically elected President of Guatemala. He wanted to tax rich banana companies and ensure they didn't own all the land. So the United Fruit Company lobbied the CIA to overthrow him. Allen Dulles, the director of the CIA, accepted immediately. His brother, wealthy businessman John Foster Dulles, was chairman of United Fruits International. So the President Árbenz was violently overthrowed. At least 9000 people were killed.

That's extreme neoliberalism.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 week ago (10 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

I got downvoted to hell last time I expressed my views about religion, but it has served me well for 29 years now (having been born in the shadow of the Vatican), so I am willing to share again:

I work, collaborate, spend time and even sometimes have sex with religious people, all while maintaining the idea that each one of them is akin to a dormant terrorist cell, and that given the right conditions their fundamental distancing from reason and in some cases recognition of undeserved authority can turn against me and everyone else.

I live a subtly tense life, but usually I am already in a safe place when shit hits the fan.

I also have a very wide definition of religion and of priest.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Came here to say fascism, but you win. Religion is worse...

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Especially since people use religion to bolster fascism. Fascists love to pander to a nation’s largest religion to lock in their support.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Capitalism is well on its way to making the planet uninhabitable so Imma have to go with that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago

Any religion. It makes people think of themselves as superior to other groups. It doesn't even matter which religion. They're all bad.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Its not necessarily an ideology but all the worst ideologies have at root a lack of empathy and active methods to extinguish any trace of it. So lack of empathy or the violent suppression of it root and stem

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Great, now we have metaideologies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

I've been warning that the average American lacks empathy for YEARS. Conservatives seemingly lack the ability to feel empathy at all, which is why Musk "warns" that empathy is dangerous.

Look where we are now 🙃

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago

Greed.

Religion has been said, but religion is always just the excuse for justifying greed

Belief that some unfalsafiable deity is behind you, and therefore any of your actions are righteous is incredibly dangerous, because there's no accountability. How many atrocities are justified by religion, and the belief that justice will be done in the next life?

Religion is used to justify things like the fascist movement currently sweeping through the US, abhorrent regimes in the middle-east, and the subjugation of people (particularly women) everywhere

Of course, religion is the justification, but the real objective is to gather more wealth and power

From the mega-churches in the US, to the Vatican, to the mullah in a village somewhere in the world, it's all about having more

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

Fascism. It makes people loose their humanity. Fascists endure anything as long as people outside their group are suffering.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nazism seem to be the worst since it's an awful mix of nationalism, imperialism, totalitarianism, state racism, eugenics.

A nazi state basically invades its neighbors and genocide their inhabitants based on race, community or health condition.

So far, only the Third Reich applied it, leading to World War II and the Holocaust, but Japan applied some similar behavior in Asia during WWII.

Bonus point: it doesn't even oppose capitalism, so rich people can still greed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

Nazism wasn’t particularly pro- or anti-capitalist as an ideology. Free markets, international finance, and trade weren’t embraced, and private property and businesses were only allowed as long as they aligned with the goals of the state. The government largely dictated production and would nationalize, heavily fine, or even destroy companies that didn’t serve its interests.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

TESCREAL

It ends in either replacing humans with AGI or massive atrocities in an attempt to achieve it.

And there are people in positions of real power who believe in this stuff and act on it.

Andreessen posted a manifesto where he said that deliberately delaying AGI is basically mass murder and should be treated as such.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

I too, think this is a really dangerous one that hasn't quite pinged on most peoples' radar yet because it's so niche, but like you said, when people with power and influence can actually act on it, they have the capacity to cause a lot of harm over what would normally just be fringe philosophies.

load more comments
view more: next ›