this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
17 points (74.3% liked)

Privacy

37662 readers
886 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
17
TM Signal (lemmy.world)
submitted 22 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

The scariest part of this recent news is that TM Signal seem(ed) to be interoperable. People using TM Signal could interact with actual Signal users. How are you to know whether or not your groups have people using bastardized versions of Signal? Are things like Session interoperable with Signal?

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Well yes, anyone can compile its own version of Signal and use it and it will work as long as there aren't some major changes to its communication protocol

[–] [email protected] 20 points 18 hours ago

Signal isn't that kind of app. It protects your data in flight, but only has minimal protections after the recipient gets the message. It's a whole other game to protect data at the endpoint. If you can't trust your recipients to protect data, then you shouldn't send them data needing protection. In order to do that you need control over all levels of the device receiving the data, hardware, operating system, file system, and software. Anything else will always leave openings for data at rest at tge destination to be compromised by untrustworthy recipients.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

In no way does Signal prevent conversations from being archived. For all you know, a recipient could be screenshotting all of your messages, and they could even be using the official app when doing so.

If you don't trust your contacts, probably shouldn't be messaging them anything sensitive.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yes of course. Signal can archive messages and they can be restored, you can screenshot messages and you can have them backed up as part of a policy like icloud backups.

My question is more about how do you know you're interacting with an authentic signal client, and not a bastardized one.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

At the moment you can't. The only realistic way I could see that happening is the the server would check the app digital signature and refuse the app from communicating with the official infrastructure if it didn't match.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Which would be absolutely disgusting given that Signal's official app lacks some basic functionality!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, I use the molly fork because there's features I like about it. I'd be sad if I couldn't use it anymore. :(

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Even then, nothing stops the client from lying to the server.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

That's the point of digitally signing the app, to ensure its authenticity and integrity. TM and others wouldn't be able to resign the modified app with the Signal Foundation signature.

EDIT: Yeah after thinking more about it it's not a trivial problem, as you need to assume that the endpoint is inherently untrusted.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's actually possible in a way:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SafetyNet

But you necessarily need to limit the devices and operating systems that are allowed. No custom ROMs, no root access, etc.

It's bullshit and breaks open computing as a concept.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Fuck Safetynet and Play Integrity.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

It's their computing and their devices, not yours.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The direct answer to your question is: verification of the security of the platform that the other party is using is outside of the scope of the Signal protocol. Anything you send to the other party can be taken off of their device. Signal only concerns itself with securing the message over the network and making it hard for an adversary with network dominance to build a social graph. It doesn't protect from all SIGINT.

Additionally, since the server is open source and the protocol is open an publicly documented, it is completely possible to build your own Signal client and give it whatever capabilities that you'd like.

There are several open source packages available that allow you to interface with Signal without using the official Signal client:

https://github.com/AsamK/signal-cli

https://gitlab.com/signald/signald (also, https://signald.org/articles/clients/ )

[–] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago

Those third-party clients have some essential, basic functionality that the official ones for some reason lack. Signal-cli allows registering from desktop without any smartphone, Molly allows an arbitrary Socks proxy instead of being limited to just Signal's own proxy solution, tying a desktop client with a link instead of scanning a QR code (thus allowing easy registration from an Android VM), and maybe most importantly for some - Notifications not relying on Google (Molly-Socket allows it to use UnifiedPush).

[–] [email protected] 10 points 21 hours ago

I mean... you do know someone can just take a screenshot, right?

And even if you use the Android thing that blocks screenshots, they can still take a photo with another phone.

You need to trust the other person for there to be any "privacy".

[–] [email protected] 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

No. Even if they were, the are plenty of ways to capture the messages.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Definitely. Capturing the messages isn't my concern though as much as interacting with non authentic clients

[–] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

What is your worry about non authentic clients?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

Poor security implementations that would become the weakest link in the security chain

[–] [email protected] 6 points 22 hours ago

Any signal conversation can be archived

[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'm out of the loop what's going on?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Some photographer took a picture of a politician in the Trump admin using a Signal clone. That signal clone allowed the user to archive chats to a third party.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago

Thanks, that's.....interesting. He doesn't seem like the type to find and try obscure apps for fun