Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
That is a lot of money for a search engine that barely works.
It barely works because it makes a lot of money
No, no. It makes aot of money because it barely works!
But that's how it's supposed to work, so it's working just fine? Amazing, actually.
That's what they need to pay to get people to use it.
When Google was released in the 90's they didn't have to pay anyone, everyone wanted to use it.
They make it work poorly so you’re more likely to click on the ads. True story.
Suddenly I don't feel at all ashamed of blocking ads. 😮
You never were freeloader lmao
Won't this kill Firefox? As far as I understand Google is providing a lot of funding with the default search engine agreement.
Related: https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4387539/firefox-money-investigating-the-bizarre-finances-of-mozilla
It would definitely require a substantial effort for Mozilla to find other funding. If I were Mozilla right now I would be trying to secure other deals to act as a safety net if this ruling goes through.
That said, with Firefox being open source apart from the branding another group could pick up development if Mozilla were to somehow go under. One of the popular "spins" of Firefox could become the predominant version and could see further browser development there.
It basically already has killed Firefox for normies, though. It's just taking a long time to die. Have a look at their market share over the last decade. Hopefully enough people keep using it that it stays actively developed, but that's hardly guaranteed.
It only needs enough users that Google keeps paying enough to be the default search engine.
Where's my 'invisible hand of the free market' guys?
That's literally it though
Really shows how much can be made from handling search queries doesn’t it.
Hell, I'll spread word of mouth $75,000 a year.
Welcome to a mid level sales position.
Even though I use iOS devices, Google isn’t my search engine on these devices. I can understand an organization like Mozilla needing the money from Google, but when we’re talking about a trillion dollar company, I cannot have the same understanding.
Like corporations would pass on literally tens of billions of dollars (yearly) just because they are big.
Unless Apple had it's own competing search service they have no reason to pass on that much money unless it becomes a huge liability.
I guess you’re right. And maybe most is their users are fine (or prefer) to use Google search, so that’s even a plus for Apple.
Why?
How would iPhone users feel if Google wasn't available on their phone?