this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
280 points (92.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

28628 readers
2082 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

EU absolutely is a country.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (7 children)

No. How much shit do we need to ban before you dumb fucks understand prohibition never fucking works and only fuels more crime.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Twitter: yes 1000 percent. Meta: businesses, landlords and social workers communicate via whatsapp here so I'd prefer bigger fines and more pressure on meta.

Yes, I use signal messenger, but I also quite literally need WhatsApp unfortunately.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

At least anything that has anything to do with Trump or Muskyboi, yes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

You might be interested in this piece from a government funded Australian think tank about escaping the current social media environment

https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/social-media-as-it-should-be/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

Depends. Not all of them are bad. Take pinterest for instance, it's harmless. And youtube is too valuable to lose. But X? Yes, X should go.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I'm definitely on board with ban of popular social media (from any country) that tracks me and collects my data even when I'm in toilet, let alone my search history on a day to day basis and sells it to others to generate it's revenue and shoves its own agenda as the result on my feed. I want something like 4chan but a little more mature in terms of audience and no modspreading like on Reddit.

Basically, Lemmy is good. Nice middle ground. Reddit like approach to content that I wanna view with other like-minded people whilst not being pushed off from the dinner table just because I wanna eat something else. Besides Reddit and fediverse, not many platforms allow that unless you completely start over with your algorithm.

I wanna be able to see and be part of whatever I chose to ignore after I feel like eating that said food tomorrow, or the week after or the next year. If any social platform provides that, to the entire world, then they should be supported no matter what. Sadly platforms like Lemmy are not that popular even though they offer almost exactly what I just asked for.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Oh lord yes!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

EUian here. I tend to say no, with a big "but" (insert Sir Mix-a-Lot joke here): I would expect legislation to govern effective content moderation by the platforms. No cutting corners to save money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

UK. yes. as well as US news, import export.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

I am a big proponent of free speech and the merits of free access to information.

Or at least I was. I've always known that bad actors with control over your information input can do an awful lot of damage. I used to think free and open access was the best choice. But seeing how a few companies captured the entire social media environment and have swollen to near-total monopolies and then how those same companies have shown themselves to be bad actors with malicious intent I have changed my opinion. Banning them would help slow down the flow of info sewage into the EU and encourage more competing companies to form. We need that since the EU can't break up American companies. So if new companies were ever to be competitive we need to remove the giants from the pool and commit to breaking up any that get too big.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Absolutely.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

All meta apps, they're used for our government's propaganda, yes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Yes.

Please tell me what I'd lose if you turned off X, Facebook, Instagram, and Reddit.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

No. I have friends who are American and it's much more feasible to communicate with them through social media since they live so far away from me. It'd also mean one of my favourite sites ever (Tumblr) would be inaccessible to me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I'd support one in America lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd tolerate it, but not support it. Forcefully taking them away gains these platforms even more support and demand. Only when people seek for alternatives or a change on their own, we can solve the problems.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

One way to promote alternatives is to make those platforms harder to use.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

I don't consider that promotion. Think from the perspective of the people who happily use US big corpo social media. When you're forced to consume B, because A is banned, you're likely not giving B a fair chance, even if it would have otherwise convinced you.

(Obviously you must still enforce rules and ban the platforms that don't abide.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I'd rather see their methods of profit be made illegal. Not all at once. Let them try to find loopholes and other unethical ways of making obscene amounts of money, and make those illegal too.

Maybe they can switch to a paid model out of necessity, and then they wouldn't be quite as omnipresent.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

I probably still wouldnt support banning any specific social media, or social media from a specific country. What needs to happen is some fucking regulation for algorithms, moderation, hate speech and misinformation. And then you can ban any social media that doesnt comply

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

No, it's how the various clubs I'm in plan and coordinate things.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›