this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
-28 points (18.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27453 readers
1902 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 minutes ago

I'm assuming this is about Neil Gaiman. 9 women, the youngest being 18, have come forward and he made them sign NDA's. Even if it was consensual the stuff he's admitted to doing is just awful. As a girl, I have every right to be angry that people like him view women as toys to use and abuse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Was this posted by Ronald MacDonald from It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia?

"Have you poured through the facts? Seen the figures? No? So let me get this straight, Mr. Reynolds... You get your information from a book, written by men you've never met, and you take their words as truth, based on a willingness to believe, a desire to accept, a leap of... humph dare I say it? Faith?"

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 hours ago

Someone who reads articles and has emotional bandwith.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago

A normal internet user

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Are we talking about anyone in particular here?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

He's referring to Neil Gaiman.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 hours ago

One word I might use is "premature". I definitely don't know about other people, but rather than the anger implied in the question, if someone had a crime or misdeed attributed to them, if what happened mattered, my biggest inclination would be to try to fill in the gaps in my mind. Along the way, this of course potentially implies things like "why did they do it", "how was it done", and "did they really". A lot of people, however, consider it conclusive based on what amounts to public perception, something I am no stranger to being on the receiving end of, and I don't think I have to tell you how destructive that has turned out. It compels me to wonder how scary our state of existence is, especially when typically getting "to the bottom of something" is associated with neurodivergence.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Curious to find the same information from another source to verify it is real.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

whoever wrote that article must be good at either citing or rage-baiting.

or both.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 hours ago

A conservative